EWEB Opposes Watershed Bill of Rights Ballot Measure

Utility cites legal concerns and potential cost impacts to ratepayers

Mar. 26, 2026 at 12:00am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) voted unanimously to oppose a proposed Watershed Bill of Rights ballot measure, citing concerns about the measure's broad language and potential for costly litigation that could impact utility operations and ratepayers. The board heard public testimony from both supporters and critics of the measure before making their decision.

Why it matters

The proposed Watershed Bill of Rights ballot measure aims to provide stronger environmental protections and accountability for polluters, but EWEB believes the measure's broad language could lead to legal challenges that would increase costs for the utility and its customers. This highlights the tension between environmental goals and legal/financial concerns that utilities must navigate.

The details

During the EWEB meeting, nine community members testified in support of the Watershed Bill of Rights measure, arguing it would safeguard water resources and address issues like industrial water use and corporate pollution. However, EWEB commissioners raised concerns about the measure's potential to trigger costly litigation, delay projects, and drive up rates for customers. The board also discussed a significant contract increase for ongoing work on the Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project, which was attributed to FERC dam safety requirements and protected species regulations.

  • The EWEB meeting took place on March 3, 2026.
  • Ballot Measure 20-373, the proposed Watershed Bill of Rights, is scheduled for a public vote.

The players

Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB)

The municipal utility that provides electricity and water services to the Eugene, Oregon area.

Watershed Bill of Rights

A proposed ballot measure that would establish legal rights for local watersheds in an effort to provide stronger environmental protections.

Doug Meyers

A Bethel neighborhood resident who criticized EWEB's opposition to the Watershed Bill of Rights.

Rob Dickinson

A community member who argued EWEB had not provided specific examples of how the Watershed Bill of Rights would negatively impact the utility's operations.

Nick Squires

A speaker who questioned the impartiality of EWEB Commissioner John Barofsky due to campaign contributions from the timber industry.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident

“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”

— Gordon Edgar, grocery employee

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.