Judge Allows Key Claims Against U.S. in Holiday Farm Fire Lawsuit

Federal judge rules several major claims against the government can move forward, while dismissing others related to power line operations.

Published on Mar. 5, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge has ruled that several major claims against the United States stemming from the 2020 Holiday Farm Fire may move forward, while dismissing others related to power line operations. The cases allege that the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) played a role in igniting or worsening the fire. The judge found that BPA's policies governing identification and removal of "fall-into danger trees" were largely mandatory and technical in nature, rather than grounded in broader public policy considerations, allowing those claims to proceed. However, the judge dismissed claims that the BPA should have de-energized its transmission lines or prevented them from re-energizing, ruling those decisions involved balancing competing goals and fell within the discretionary function exception.

Why it matters

This ruling narrows the scope of the litigation but allows significant negligence claims to proceed against the federal government. The United States remains a defendant on claims related to vegetation management, while allegations tied to power shutoffs and energization decisions have been dismissed. The outcome of this case could have major implications for how utility companies and government agencies are held accountable for their role in devastating wildfires.

The details

The Holiday Farm Fire began on September 7, 2020, during extreme wind and dry conditions. Two separate ignitions along Highway 126 merged into a blaze that burned more than 170,000 acres, destroyed over 700 structures, and claimed one life. According to U.S. Forest Service investigators, one ignition occurred near McKenzie Bridge after a tree fell onto a de-energized Eugene Water & Electric Board line, pushing it into an energized line owned by Lane Electric Cooperative and re-energizing the EWEB line. A second ignition point occurred about six miles west near milepost 41, where a tree fell onto the BPA's Cougar-Holden transmission line. Multiple groups have filed suit, including fire survivors, property owners, timber companies, and insurance carriers seeking reimbursement.

  • The Holiday Farm Fire began on September 7, 2020.
  • The court ruling was issued on February 11, 2026.

The players

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)

A federal agency that operates and maintains a high-voltage electric transmission system in the Pacific Northwest.

Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB)

A public utility that provides electricity and water services to the city of Eugene, Oregon.

Lane Electric Cooperative

A member-owned electric cooperative that provides power to rural areas of Lane County, Oregon.

Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai

The U.S. District Judge who issued the ruling in the case.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Immunizing the United States for standard maintenance of the sort here would run counter to the directive that courts should construe the FTCA's waiver broadly and its exceptions narrowly.”

— Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai, U.S. District Judge

What’s next

The consolidated cases will now proceed through further pretrial proceedings and a potential trial, unless they're resolved through a settlement.

The takeaway

This ruling highlights the complex legal and policy considerations around utility companies' responsibilities for wildfire prevention and response, and the challenges of holding government agencies accountable for their actions. The outcome of this case could set an important precedent for how such disputes are resolved in the future.