ADT Inc. Shareholders Encouraged to Seek Potential Recovery

Johnson Fistel investigating potential securities law violations by ADT

Published on Mar. 2, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Johnson Fistel, PLLP, a national shareholder-rights law firm, is investigating potential claims on behalf of investors of ADT Inc. (NYSE: ADT) regarding the company's compliance with federal securities laws. The investigation focuses on ADT's recent financial results and guidance, which caused the company's stock price to decline sharply.

Why it matters

This investigation could potentially allow ADT shareholders who suffered losses on their investments to recover those losses if the law firm finds that the company and its executives violated securities laws in their financial reporting and disclosures.

The details

On March 2, 2026, ADT reported its fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results. The company reported fourth-quarter revenue of approximately $1.276 billion and full-year revenue of approximately $5.129 billion, which fell below analyst expectations. ADT also provided 2026 guidance indicating that revenue and earnings per share are expected to be approximately flat compared to 2025. Following this disclosure, ADT's shares declined sharply.

  • On March 2, 2026, ADT reported its fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results.

The players

Johnson Fistel, PLLP

A nationally recognized shareholder-rights law firm that is investigating potential claims on behalf of ADT Inc. investors.

ADT Inc.

A publicly traded home security and automation company.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“If you purchased ADT securities and suffered losses on your investment, join our investigation now: Click here to join the investigation.”

— Jim Baker, Attorney (Johnson Fistel, PLLP)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.