- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Washington Today
By the People, for the People
Disputes Arise Over Plans for America's 250th Anniversary Celebration
Congressional Democrats accuse Trump administration of trying to hijack the commemoration and use it for political gain.
Published on Feb. 10, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Congressional Democrats accused the Trump administration of attempting to hijack plans for the 250th anniversary celebration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, using the nonprofit National Park Foundation to solicit money from private donors for the president's pet projects, including a massive arch in Washington, D.C. They raised concerns about the administration's efforts to sanitize historical exhibits and displays, as well as a lack of transparency around funding and private donations.
Why it matters
The 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States is a significant milestone, and there are concerns that the Trump administration is trying to use the commemoration for political purposes and to promote a particular narrative, rather than allowing a balanced and inclusive celebration of the country's history.
The details
During a congressional hearing, Democratic lawmakers accused the Trump administration of trying to 'hijack the country's 250th anniversary and sell access, hide his donors and rewrite history.' They raised concerns about a White House-led initiative called Freedom 250 that is using public money earmarked for a separate, congressionally chartered commission called America250, and is co-mingling it with private donations, making it difficult to determine who is donating. Democrats also expressed concerns about national park exhibits and displays being sanitized or removed as part of the administration's efforts to quash diversity, equity, and inclusion.
- The congressional hearing took place on Tuesday, February 11, 2026.
The players
Jared Huffman
A Democratic U.S. Representative from California who accused the Trump administration of attempting to use the 250th anniversary celebration to 'promote an alternate reality'.
Maxine Dexter
A Democratic U.S. Representative from Oregon who voiced concern that the White House-led Freedom 250 initiative is using public money earmarked for the congressionally chartered America250 commission and co-mingling it with private donations, making it difficult to determine the sources of funding.
Donald Trump
The former president whose administration is accused of trying to hijack the 250th anniversary celebration for political purposes.
Jeff Reinbold
The president and CEO of the National Park Foundation, which typically raises money to help the national parks and must grant anonymity if a donor requests it.
Tim Whitehouse
The executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, who testified that the American people deserve to know where the money for the 250th anniversary commemoration is going.
What they’re saying
“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”
— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)
“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”
— Gordon Edgar, grocery employee (Instagram)
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.
The takeaway
This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.


