Trump Praised for Blocking State AI Regulations

Former president's executive order aimed to prevent a patchwork of state rules on emerging tech.

Apr. 11, 2026 at 9:24am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A highly detailed 3D illustration of glowing, interconnected cybernetic hardware components in shades of neon blue, purple, and magenta, conceptually representing the complex infrastructure behind artificial intelligence systems.As the federal government seeks to streamline AI oversight, the intricate digital networks powering this transformative technology remain largely hidden from public view.Today in Tulsa

A new report from the Tulsa World argues that former President Trump was right to issue an executive order blocking states from creating their own regulations on artificial intelligence. The order, which was signed in 2024, aimed to prevent a patchwork of state-level rules that could stifle innovation in the rapidly evolving AI industry.

Why it matters

As AI becomes more pervasive across industries, there are growing concerns about the need for consistent national policies to govern its development and use. Critics argue that a state-by-state approach could create compliance challenges for companies and hinder the advancement of transformative technologies.

The details

Trump's executive order prohibited states from enacting any laws or regulations related to the research, development, or deployment of AI systems without first obtaining approval from the federal government. The goal was to ensure a unified national framework for AI governance, rather than a fragmented patchwork of state rules.

  • The executive order was signed by President Trump in January 2024.

The players

Donald Trump

The 45th President of the United States who issued the executive order blocking state AI regulations.

Stephen Covey

A renowned organizational consultant who is quoted in the article.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.”

— Stephen Covey, Organizational Consultant

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing debate over the appropriate balance between state and federal oversight of emerging technologies like AI. While some argue for a unified national approach, others contend that states should have more flexibility to address local concerns and needs.