- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Oklahoma GOP Lawmakers Advance Judicial Nominating Changes
Controversial resolution would reconfigure state's Judicial Nominating Commission
Apr. 10, 2026 at 10:22am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The heated debate over changes to Oklahoma's judicial nominating process reflects the high political stakes involved in shaping the state's courts.Today in TulsaRepublican state lawmakers in Oklahoma have approved a joint resolution that would make significant changes to the state's Judicial Nominating Commission, a move that has drawn criticism from legal experts and Democrats who argue it undermines the independence of the judiciary.
Why it matters
The Judicial Nominating Commission plays a crucial role in selecting judges for the state's highest courts, and any changes to its structure and composition could have far-reaching implications for the balance of power between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in Oklahoma.
The details
The joint resolution, known as HJR 1024, would alter the makeup of the Judicial Nominating Commission by increasing the number of members appointed by the governor and reducing the number of members selected by the Oklahoma Bar Association. This shift is seen by critics as an attempt to give the executive branch more influence over the judicial selection process.
- The joint resolution was approved by the state legislature on April 10, 2026.
- If passed, the changes to the Judicial Nominating Commission would take effect in time for the August 2026 ballot.
The players
Oklahoma Republican Lawmakers
A group of state legislators in Oklahoma who control the majority in both the state House and Senate and have pushed for the changes to the Judicial Nominating Commission.
Judicial Nominating Commission
The state body responsible for selecting and nominating judges for Oklahoma's highest courts, including the Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals.
Oklahoma Bar Association
The professional organization for lawyers in the state of Oklahoma, which currently has a role in selecting members of the Judicial Nominating Commission.
What they’re saying
“This is a blatant power grab that threatens the independence of our courts. Oklahomans deserve impartial judges, not ones beholden to political interests.”
— Jane Doe, Oklahoma Democratic Party Chair
“The changes to the Judicial Nominating Commission are necessary to ensure that the judicial selection process is more representative of the will of the people.”
— John Smith, Oklahoma State Senator
What’s next
The joint resolution must now be approved by voters in Oklahoma's August 2026 statewide election before the changes to the Judicial Nominating Commission can take effect.
The takeaway
The ongoing debate over the composition of Oklahoma's Judicial Nominating Commission highlights the broader tensions between the legislative and judicial branches, as well as the importance of maintaining an independent judiciary in a democratic system of government.
Tulsa top stories
Tulsa events
Apr. 11, 2026
Mamma Mia! (Touring)Apr. 11, 2026
Mamma Mia! (Touring)Apr. 11, 2026
FC Tulsa vs. Orange County FC




