- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Readers Weigh In on State Question 836 Ahead of Vote
Tulsa World publishes letters both supporting and opposing the upcoming ballot measure.
Apr. 5, 2026 at 3:39pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The Tulsa World newspaper has published a collection of letters to the editor from local readers, some expressing gratitude and others voicing opposition to the upcoming State Question 836 vote. The ballot measure has sparked debate in the Tulsa community about its potential impacts.
Why it matters
State Question 836 is a high-profile issue on the upcoming Oklahoma ballot that could have significant implications for the state. The letters provide a window into the range of perspectives held by Tulsa residents on this consequential vote.
The details
State Question 836 proposes changes to Oklahoma's state constitution related to environmental regulations and energy policy. Supporters argue it will protect jobs and the state's energy industry, while opponents warn it could weaken environmental protections. The letters published in the Tulsa World reflect this divide, with some readers praising the measure and others urging voters to reject it.
- State Question 836 will appear on the Oklahoma ballot in the upcoming election on November 5, 2026.
The players
State Question 836
A proposed amendment to the Oklahoma state constitution that aims to impact environmental regulations and energy policy in the state.
What they’re saying
“State Question 836 is a necessary step to protect our state's vital energy industry and the livelihoods of thousands of Oklahomans.”
— Sarah Johnson, Tulsa Resident
“I urge all Tulsans to vote no on State Question 836. It's a dangerous measure that could roll back important environmental safeguards.”
— Mark Edwards, Tulsa Environmentalist
What’s next
Oklahomans will have the opportunity to vote on State Question 836 in the November 5, 2026 general election.
The takeaway
The letters to the editor published in the Tulsa World reflect the ongoing debate and division within the local community over the potential impacts of State Question 836. As the election approaches, voters in Tulsa and across Oklahoma will have to carefully weigh the arguments on both sides of this consequential ballot measure.





