Bill to Delay Ex-Lawmakers from Becoming Lobbyists Fails Committee Vote

Concerns over First Amendment rights and special interest influence lead to bipartisan rejection of proposed waiting period.

Published on Feb. 26, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A bill that would have required former Oklahoma lawmakers to wait several years before returning to the Capitol as lobbyists failed in committee, with concerns centering on the First Amendment rights of former legislators and the groups who may want them as lobbyists. The bill's author argues the vote shows lawmakers are beholden to special interests.

Why it matters

The issue of lawmakers-turned-lobbyists is a growing ethics concern, with perceptions that special interests wield outsized influence at the state Capitol. This failed bill highlights the tensions between regulating lobbying activities and protecting the rights of former lawmakers.

The details

State Rep. Jim Shaw, R-Chandler, filed the bill to address what he sees as a growing ethics problem, noting that many former lawmakers return almost immediately as lobbyists, giving them a clear advantage with existing relationships and access. His bill would have required a four-year waiting period. However, the House committee voted 6-2 against the bill, with concerns that it would infringe on the First Amendment rights of former legislators and the groups that may want to hire them.

  • The bill was filed and considered by a House committee on February 26, 2026.

The players

Jim Shaw

A Republican state representative from Chandler, Oklahoma who filed the bill to create a waiting period for former lawmakers to become lobbyists.

Collin Duel

A Republican state representative from Guthrie, Oklahoma who argued the bill would prevent groups from hiring former lawmakers with intimate knowledge of the legislative process.

Suzanne Schreiber

A Democratic state representative from Tulsa, Oklahoma who said the bill was using government regulation to prevent people from seeking employment.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The first amendment, one of the fundamental purposes, of it is to petition the government. And there are groups of collective individuals who can't always just come up here, and they may want to hire somebody who has the most intimate knowledge with how this building works.”

— Collin Duel, State Representative (kfor.com)

“It's using government regulation to prevent people from seeking employment.”

— Suzanne Schreiber, State Representative (kfor.com)

What’s next

Since the bill died in committee, it is unlikely to be brought up again this legislative session.

The takeaway

This failed bill highlights the ongoing debate over regulating the influence of special interests and lobbyists in state politics, with concerns over balancing ethical reforms and protecting the rights of former lawmakers.