- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Ada Today
By the People, for the People
Attorney Arrested After Heated Courtroom Clash with Judge
Footage shows tense exchange leading to contempt of court charge and physical struggle
Apr. 3, 2026 at 9:53pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The dramatic arrest of an attorney in an Oklahoma courtroom exposes the high tensions and emotions that can arise in contentious legal proceedings.Ada TodayA hearing in an Oklahoma courtroom ended with the attorney, Rob Hopkins, being led out in handcuffs after a heated exchange with Judge Lori Jackson. The confrontation stemmed from Hopkins' client not showing up to a custody hearing, leading to a back-and-forth between the attorney and judge that escalated to the point where the judge called in officers to arrest Hopkins for contempt of court. Footage shows a struggle between Hopkins and the officers, with the attorney at one point saying 'I can't breathe'.
Why it matters
The incident highlights the high tensions and emotions that can arise in contentious legal proceedings, especially when an attorney feels their client's interests are not being properly represented. It raises questions about judicial temperament, attorney-court decorum, and the appropriate use of contempt of court powers.
The details
According to the other attorney in the courtroom, Lloyd Palmer, the frustration stemmed from Hopkins' client not showing up to the custody hearing, as she had a warrant out for her arrest. This led Hopkins to try to 'testify' and act as more than just a lawyer, which the judge would not allow. The heated exchange featured both Hopkins and Judge Jackson talking over each other multiple times. Hopkins also questioned whether he was being treated differently due to his gender identity as a transgender attorney.
- The incident occurred during a hearing in an Oklahoma courtroom on April 3, 2026.
The players
Rob Hopkins
A 13-year veteran attorney who has taken on many difficult and contentious cases, often pro bono, in order to be a voice for underserved clients. He was arrested for resisting arrest and is now stepping away from his legal practice.
Judge Lori Jackson
The Pontotoc County judge presiding over the hearing where the confrontation with Hopkins took place.
Lloyd Palmer
The other attorney in the courtroom, who represented the client who was present and ready for the custody hearing, unlike Hopkins' absent client.
What they’re saying
“'You interrupt me one more time, you are being held in direct contempt of court. And then watch that smirk.'”
— Judge Lori Jackson, Pontotoc County Judge
“'The mother has a warrant out for her arrest, or did at that time at least, so she couldn't be there to testify and give evidence, whereas my client was there and ready to have the hearing.'”
— Lloyd Palmer, Attorney
“'Is it because I'm a transgender attorney practicing all over the state?'”
— Rob Hopkins, Attorney
“'I felt bad for a fellow attorney who's probably having his worst day. Nobody wants to be judged by their worst day. But it was a very sad situation and is not good for anyone.'”
— Lloyd Palmer, Attorney
What’s next
Hopkins was charged with resisting arrest and said he is stepping away from his legal practice. It is unclear if he will face any further disciplinary action from the state bar association.
The takeaway
This incident underscores the high-stakes, high-emotion environment of contentious legal proceedings, where tensions can quickly escalate between attorneys and judges. It raises important questions about maintaining professional decorum, respecting judicial authority, and ensuring fair treatment for all parties involved, regardless of personal identity.

