Westlake Resident Charged for 'Prank' Phone Demand

Brook Park gas station worker allegedly requested money to return customer's forgotten cell phone

Mar. 8, 2026 at 8:39am

A 45-year-old Westlake resident who works at a Brook Park gas station is facing charges after allegedly demanding money from a customer to return their forgotten cell phone. Police say the worker first requested $50, then $100, before officers intervened and recovered the phone at the station. The man later claimed it was a prank, but the case is moving forward.

Why it matters

This incident highlights the potential for abuse of power and exploitation by service workers, as well as the need for clear policies and training around handling lost or forgotten customer property. It also raises questions about the line between a prank and criminal behavior, and how the justice system should respond.

The details

According to reports, the Westlake resident who works at the Brook Park Sunoco gas station allegedly refused to return a customer's forgotten cell phone unless the customer paid him a fee. Police say the worker first demanded $50, then increased the amount to $100, before officers intervened and recovered the phone at the station. The worker later claimed the incident was just a prank, but authorities are moving forward with charges.

  • The incident occurred on March 7, 2026.

The players

Westlake Resident

A 45-year-old Westlake resident who works at a Brook Park gas station.

Brook Park Sunoco

The gas station where the incident took place.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to take advantage of customers in this way.”

— Robert Jenkins, Westlake Resident

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow the Westlake resident out on bail.

The takeaway

This incident highlights the need for clear policies and training around handling lost or forgotten customer property, as well as the potential for abuse of power by service workers. It also raises questions about the line between a prank and criminal behavior, and how the justice system should respond.