Legal Disputes Arise Over New County Jails in Ohio

A change in state law is now being cited to challenge the legality of jail construction projects in Cuyahoga and Lorain counties.

Mar. 30, 2026 at 3:42pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A serene, cinematic painting of an empty county courthouse or jail building, with warm sunlight streaming through the windows and deep shadows cast across the facade, conveying a sense of solemnity and contemplation around the legal disputes over these public infrastructure projects.Legal disputes over new county jail projects in Ohio expose the unintended consequences of legislative changes, even those meant to streamline the approval process.Lorain Today

A seemingly minor change to Ohio law in 2024 is now being used by local prosecutors to challenge the legality of new jail construction projects in Cuyahoga and Lorain counties. The law, which was intended to streamline the approval process for small county building projects, is now being interpreted by prosecutors as requiring a two-step approval process for jail projects over $75,000, including approval from the county commissioners as well as a majority of the county sheriff, probate judge, common pleas court clerk, and a judge's appointee.

Why it matters

The legal disputes over the new jail projects highlight the unintended consequences that can arise from legislative changes, even those meant to be routine. The new interpretation of the law gives more power to the judicial branch over county jail projects, which could significantly impact the timeline and approval process for these critical public infrastructure investments.

The details

HB497, passed by the Ohio legislature in 2024, rewrote language dating back to the late 1860s regarding the approval process for county jail and courthouse projects. The old law required approval from a majority of the county commissioners, common pleas court clerk, a common pleas judge appointee, the county sheriff, and a county probate judge. The revised law under HB497 allowed projects under $75,000 to be approved by just the commissioners, but stated that projects over $75,000 also required approval from the other four officials. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Michael O'Malley and the Lorain County Prosecutor's Office have now cited this change to challenge the legality of new jail projects in their counties, arguing the two-step approval process was not the intent of the legislature.

  • HB497 was passed by the Ohio legislature in December 2024 and signed into law by Gov. Mike DeWine in early 2025.
  • Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Michael O'Malley sent a letter to the county executive on Thursday, March 30, 2026 asserting the county's jail project was done illegally.
  • Last month, in February 2026, the Lorain County Prosecutor's Office issued a legal opinion that county officials violated the law by not getting the required approvals for their jail project.

The players

Michael O'Malley

The Cuyahoga County Prosecutor who is challenging the legality of the new county jail project.

Chris Ronayne

The Cuyahoga County Executive overseeing the new county jail project.

Brian Stewart

A Republican state representative from Pickaway County and a lead cosponsor of HB497, who disagrees with the prosecutors' interpretation of the law.

Sean Brennan

A Democratic state representative from Parma who was a cosponsor of HB497 and believes the law was not intended to be interpreted the way the prosecutors have.

Chris Abbuhl

The former president of the County Commissioners Association of Ohio, who testified that the changes in HB497 were meant to make public improvement projects more efficient.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“It doesn't seem like the language was artfully drawn.”

— Michael O'Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

“We were not sort of attempting to get rid of the process that's been in the code for more than 100 years entirely. The goal was, let's not have to convene seven elected officials to replace a sink in a courthouse.”

— Brian Stewart, State Representative

“Jail construction in particular is often time sensitive and it is sometimes difficult to coordinate the schedules of the committee to meet quickly. Thus, adding this (spending) threshold will make these public improvement projects more timely and efficient.”

— Chris Abbuhl, Former President, County Commissioners Association of Ohio

What’s next

The legal disputes over the new jail projects in Cuyahoga and Lorain counties are expected to be decided in the courts, as state lawmakers disagree on the intent behind the 2024 law change.

The takeaway

This case highlights the unintended consequences that can arise from legislative changes, even those intended to be routine. The new interpretation of the law gives more power to the judicial branch over county jail projects, which could significantly impact the timeline and approval process for these critical public infrastructure investments.