Browns Withdraw Proposal to Extend Draft Pick Trading

The league was not receptive to the Browns' plan to allow trading of picks up to 5 years out.

Mar. 30, 2026 at 9:36pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A cubist-style painting depicting a fragmented, geometric football draft board, representing the complex dynamics around the league's draft pick trading rules.The Browns' failed proposal to expand future draft pick trading reflects the NFL's desire to maintain the scarcity and value of draft capital.Cleveland Today

The Cleveland Browns proposed allowing NFL teams to trade draft picks up to 5 years into the future, but the team ultimately withdrew the proposal before it could be voted on at the league meetings in Phoenix. The proposal faced significant opposition, including from Rams head coach Sean McVay who said it had a "zero percent chance" of being approved.

Why it matters

The ability to trade future draft picks is a key part of team-building in the NFL, but extending that window too far could lead to a devaluation of draft capital in general. The Browns' proposal raised questions about the team's long-term plans, particularly around star defensive end Myles Garrett.

The details

The Browns' proposal would have extended the current 3-year window for trading draft picks to 5 years. Rams president Kevin Demoff supported the idea, saying it would create more interest and options for teams. However, Rams coach Sean McVay, who is on the NFL's Competition Committee, said the proposal had "zero percent chance" of being approved, and the committee voted it down 11-0. Extending the trading window could lead to a devaluation of draft picks in general, as more picks would be in circulation. The proposal also came around the same time the Browns restructured Myles Garrett's contract, leading to speculation the team could be looking to trade the star defensive end, which the team denied.

  • The Browns proposed the rule change at the NFL's Annual League Meeting in Phoenix in March 2026.
  • The NFL's Competition Committee voted down the proposal 11-0 before it could be presented to team owners for a vote.

The players

Cleveland Browns

The NFL team that proposed allowing teams to trade draft picks up to 5 years into the future.

Kevin Demoff

The president of the Los Angeles Rams, who publicly supported the Browns' proposal.

Sean McVay

The head coach of the Los Angeles Rams, who is on the NFL's Competition Committee and said the proposal had a "zero percent chance" of being approved.

Andrew Berry

The general manager of the Cleveland Browns, who proposed the rule change and had to deny that it was related to potentially trading star defensive end Myles Garrett.

Myles Garrett

The star defensive end for the Cleveland Browns, whose long-term future with the team was questioned due to the timing of the proposal and a contract restructuring.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Nothing creates more interest in the NFL than trades. This is why Cleveland's proposal to allow teams to trade picks up to 5 years out as opposed to 3 years out makes so much sense. More picks to trade = more trades = more interest & team building options.”

— Kevin Demoff, President, Los Angeles Rams

“I respect the courage for Andrew [Berry] to be able to have a very sound reasoning of what's behind it. If there's one thing you can bet Vegas odds on, there's no chance that thing's getting through.”

— Sean McVay, Head Coach, Los Angeles Rams

“Myles is a career Brown. He is one of the faces of our organization. I think we've been very clear both past and present in terms of our feelings. I understand all the questions. I'll be honest, I don't really want to waste a ton more breath on the topic.”

— Andrew Berry, General Manager, Cleveland Browns

What’s next

The Browns' proposal will not be presented for a vote by NFL team owners after being withdrawn following the Competition Committee's 11-0 rejection.

The takeaway

The Browns' failed proposal to extend the window for trading future draft picks highlights the delicate balance the league must strike between innovation and preserving the scarcity and value of draft capital. It also raises questions about the long-term future of star players like Myles Garrett in Cleveland.