Cleveland Police Consent Decree Progress Detailed in 18th Report

Independent Monitor cites improvements in crisis intervention and staffing, but more work needed on civilian oversight and accountability.

Mar. 17, 2026 at 1:19am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The 18th Semiannual Report from the Independent Monitoring Team overseeing the Cleveland Police Department's consent decree was filed, detailing the progress made on federally mandated reforms that began in 2015. While the report notes significant upgrades in areas like crisis intervention and staffing, it states that more work is still needed, particularly on civilian oversight, accountability, and discipline.

Why it matters

The consent decree was put in place after a U.S. Department of Justice investigation found a "pattern or practice" of excessive force and other civil rights violations by the Cleveland Police, including the high-profile 2012 incident known as the "137 shots" case. The progress on the consent decree has been closely watched as a test case for police reform efforts in major U.S. cities.

The details

The Independent Monitor, Christine Cole, noted in her letter that the main focus for 2026 will be on the civilian oversight apparatus, accountability, and discipline, which she said are "still in need of work." While the city has filed a joint motion with the Trump-era Department of Justice to terminate the consent decree, stating it has achieved "substantial compliance," the judge overseeing the case has expressed surprise at this move, noting there are still 8 other areas of reform that have not been fully addressed.

  • The 18th Semiannual Report was filed on Monday, March 17, 2026.
  • A status conference to discuss the report is scheduled for 3 p.m. on Wednesday, March 19, 2026.

The players

Christine Cole

The Independent Monitor overseeing the Cleveland Police Department's consent decree progress.

Solomon Oliver Jr.

The federal judge overseeing the Cleveland police reforms and consent decree.

Ayesha Bell Hardaway

A Case Western Reserve University law professor who previously served on the federal monitoring team overseeing Cleveland's progress and as interim head monitor.

R. Jonas Geissler

The Deputy Assistant Attorney General who said the joint motion to end the consent decree was not politically motivated but based on Cleveland's progress.

Timothy Russell and Malissa Williams

The two unarmed individuals killed in the 2012 "137 shots" incident that led to the consent decree.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The facts dictate its time, not who's in charge at DOJ.”

— R. Jonas Geissler, Deputy Assistant Attorney General (news5cleveland.com)

“For them to file this motion in agreement with the Trump DOJ certainly does make for strange bedfellows at this time.”

— Ayesha Bell Hardaway, Case Western Reserve University law professor (news5cleveland.com)

What’s next

The federal judge overseeing the consent decree will hold a status conference on Wednesday, March 19, 2026 to discuss the 18th Semiannual Report and the city's motion to terminate the consent decree.

The takeaway

The progress on the Cleveland police consent decree continues to be closely watched as a test case for police reform efforts nationwide. While the city has made significant strides in some areas, the Independent Monitor's report indicates there is still more work to be done, particularly around civilian oversight and accountability, before the consent decree can be fully terminated.