- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Justice Department's Misconduct Complaint Against Judge Boasberg Gets Tossed
Federal appeals court dismisses rare complaint filed by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi over judge's comments about Trump administration
Jan. 31, 2026 at 5:55pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A federal appeals court judge has dismissed a judicial misconduct complaint filed by the U.S. Justice Department against Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C. The complaint, announced by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, alleged that Boasberg made improper comments about former President Donald Trump during a meeting of the judiciary's policymaking body, the Judicial Conference.
Why it matters
The dismissal of the DOJ's complaint against Judge Boasberg is seen as a victory for judicial independence, as the complaint was viewed by many as an attempt by the Trump administration to exert political pressure on the judiciary. The case highlights the ongoing tensions between the executive and judicial branches, and the importance of maintaining the separation of powers.
The details
Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the alleged statements by Boasberg, even if true, would not have violated judicial ethics rules. Sutton said the DOJ lacked proof that Boasberg made the comments attributed to him, and that expressing 'anxiety about executive-branch compliance with judicial orders' is not improper during a meeting of the Judicial Conference.
- The complaint was filed by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in July 2025.
- The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the complaint in an order dated December 19, 2025.
The players
James Boasberg
Chief U.S. District Judge in Washington, D.C., appointed by former President Barack Obama.
Pam Bondi
U.S. Attorney General who filed the judicial misconduct complaint against Judge Boasberg.
Jeffrey Sutton
Chief U.S. Circuit Judge of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, who dismissed the DOJ's complaint against Boasberg.
John Roberts
Chief U.S. Supreme Court Justice, who attended the Judicial Conference meeting where Boasberg's alleged comments were made.
Donald Trump
Former President of the United States, whose administration's actions were criticized by Judge Boasberg.
What they’re saying
“In these settings, a judge's expression of anxiety about executive-branch compliance with judicial orders, whether rightly feared or not, is not so far afield from customary topics at these meetings—judicial independence, judicial security, and inter-branch relations—as to violate the Codes of Judicial Conduct.”
— Jeffrey Sutton, Chief U.S. Circuit Judge, 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
What’s next
The dismissal of the DOJ's complaint against Judge Boasberg is likely to be seen as a significant victory for judicial independence, and may further strain the relationship between the executive and judicial branches under the Trump administration.
The takeaway
This case highlights the ongoing tensions between the executive and judicial branches, and the importance of maintaining the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary. The dismissal of the DOJ's complaint against Judge Boasberg is a win for those who believe in the rule of law and the ability of the courts to check the power of the executive branch.
Cincinnati top stories
Cincinnati events
Mar. 20, 2026
D. L. HughleyMar. 20, 2026
D. L. Hughley




