Jury Deadlocks in $60M FirstEnergy Bribery Trial

Corruption case against two former executives ends in mistrial

Mar. 31, 2026 at 4:48pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A photorealistic studio still life featuring a metal briefcase, stacks of cash, and a gavel, symbolizing the abstract corporate corruption and legal battle at the heart of this story.A high-stakes legal battle over alleged corporate bribery and political influence in Ohio ends in a mistrial, prolonging the pursuit of accountability.Akron Today

A jury in Akron, Ohio has failed to reach a verdict in the trial of two former FirstEnergy Corp. executives accused of orchestrating a $60 million bribery scheme. The case against ex-CEO Chuck Jones and former senior VP Michael Dowling ended in a mistrial after jurors reported they were at an impasse.

Why it matters

The failed prosecution is a setback in efforts to hold corporate leaders accountable for alleged corruption and bribery. The high-profile case had drawn national attention as part of a wider federal investigation into FirstEnergy's lobbying practices and political influence in Ohio.

The details

Prosecutors alleged that Jones and Dowling were central figures in a scheme to funnel $60 million in bribes to former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder in exchange for a $1 billion ratepayer-funded bailout of two nuclear power plants owned by a FirstEnergy subsidiary. The mistrial means the case will likely be retried, prolonging the legal battle.

  • The jury began deliberations on March 25, 2026.
  • On March 31, 2026, the jury reported they were deadlocked and could not reach a unanimous verdict.

The players

Chuck Jones

Former CEO of FirstEnergy Corp., one of the two executives charged in the bribery case.

Michael Dowling

Former senior vice president of FirstEnergy Corp., the other executive charged in the bribery case.

Larry Householder

Former Ohio House Speaker who was allegedly bribed by FirstEnergy executives in exchange for a $1 billion ratepayer-funded bailout of two nuclear power plants.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This is a disappointing outcome, but we respect the jury's decision and will evaluate our next steps.”

— U.S. Attorney Bridget Brennan, Prosecutor in the case

What’s next

Prosecutors will likely decide whether to retry the case against Jones and Dowling in the coming weeks.

The takeaway

The mistrial highlights the challenges of prosecuting high-level corporate corruption cases, even with extensive evidence. It also raises questions about the effectiveness of the justice system in holding powerful executives accountable for alleged bribery and influence peddling.