- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
The Athletic Faces Internal Backlash Over Dianna Russini Situation
Staffers express concerns about the publication's handling of the controversy involving one of its top NFL reporters.
Apr. 13, 2026 at 3:24pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The fallout from The Athletic's handling of the Dianna Russini controversy has exposed internal tensions and threatened the publication's credibility.NYC TodayAs The Athletic investigates an incident involving reporter Dianna Russini and Tennessee Titans head coach Mike Vrabel, some employees within The Athletic and its parent company, the New York Times, have voiced concerns about the publication's public relations strategy. Sources described the initial statement from The Athletic's executive editor as 'reckless,' 'premature,' and 'intentionally sneaky,' lacking crucial context about an ongoing internal review.
Why it matters
The Russini situation has put The Athletic in a difficult position, as the publication must balance addressing the controversy publicly while also respecting the privacy of its employee. However, the perceived missteps in the initial response have led to internal unrest, with some staffers questioning the credibility impact on their own reporting.
The details
According to reports, The Athletic is investigating photos that surfaced of Russini interacting with Titans head coach Mike Vrabel in a way that some deemed inappropriate. Rather than acknowledge the investigation, The Athletic's executive editor issued a strong denial, calling the photos 'misleading' and lacking 'essential context.' Sources say this approach was 'unnecessarily messy' and failed to convey that an internal review was already underway.
- The photos of Russini and Vrabel surfaced in early April 2026.
- The Athletic executive editor Steven Ginsberg issued his initial statement shortly after the photos were published.
- Russini's contract with The Athletic is reportedly set to expire in August 2026.
The players
Dianna Russini
A prominent NFL reporter for The Athletic who is at the center of the controversy.
Mike Vrabel
The head coach of the Tennessee Titans, who was involved in the incident with Russini.
Steven Ginsberg
The executive editor of The Athletic, who issued the initial statement regarding the Russini situation.
Natalie Korach
A reporter for the media industry publication Status, who broke the story about internal concerns at The Athletic and the New York Times.
Sam Neumann
A reporter for the sports media website Awful Announcing, who reported on Korach's story.
What they’re saying
“These photos are misleading and lack essential context. These were public interactions in front of many people. Dianna is a premier journalist covering the NFL and we're proud to have her at The Athletic.”
— Steven Ginsberg, Executive Editor, The Athletic
“The companies' handling of the matter was 'unnecessarily messy.'”
— Unnamed source
“The initial statement from The Athletic was 'reckless,' 'premature,' and 'intentionally sneaky.'”
— Unnamed source
What’s next
The Athletic is expected to complete its internal investigation into the Russini situation in the coming weeks. The publication will then need to determine whether Russini will return to her role or if the company will part ways with her before her contract expires in August 2026.
The takeaway
The Athletic's handling of the Russini controversy has created internal unrest, with some staffers questioning the credibility impact on their own reporting. The publication will need to carefully navigate the situation and provide a clear, definitive response that reassures both its employees and the public.





