- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
States Sue Trump Administration Over Greenhouse Gas Ruling Repeal
A coalition of states and local governments challenge the federal government's decision to scrap a critical climate change policy.
Apr. 12, 2026 at 8:29pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
As states challenge the federal government's rollback of climate change regulations, the urgency of the crisis is starkly illustrated through a fragmented, dynamic visual metaphor.NYC TodayA group of 23 states and 17 cities and counties have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its decision to repeal the 2009 'endangerment finding' that recognized greenhouse gases as a threat to public health. This ruling provided the legal basis for emissions regulations, and its repeal is seen as an attempt to prioritize industry interests over environmental concerns.
Why it matters
The lawsuit represents a broader struggle over the future of climate change policies in the United States. With the Trump administration consistently downplaying the severity of the climate crisis and rolling back environmental protections, this legal challenge is a crucial step in holding the federal government accountable for its responsibilities in addressing the climate emergency.
The details
The lawsuit is a direct response to the Trump administration's decision to scrap the 2009 'endangerment finding' made under the Obama administration. This ruling provided the legal basis for emissions regulations, and its repeal effectively undermines the foundation of US climate policies. The Environmental Protection Agency has defended its decision, claiming the lawsuit is politically motivated, but critics argue this move is an attempt to prioritize industry interests over public health and the environment.
- The lawsuit was filed in April 2026.
The players
Letitia James
The attorney general of New York, who emphasizes the urgency of addressing the climate crisis and states that the Trump administration's denial of this reality is detrimental to the nation's well-being.
Donald Trump
The former president, who has consistently downplayed the severity of climate change and sees the rollback of the 'endangerment finding' as a victory over what he calls the 'Green New Scam.'
What they’re saying
“The Trump administration's denial of this reality is detrimental to the nation's well-being.”
— Letitia James, New York Attorney General
“This lawsuit is politically motivated.”
— Environmental Protection Agency
What’s next
The lawsuit will be heard in court, and the outcome will have significant implications for the future of climate change policies in the United States.
The takeaway
This legal challenge represents a crucial step in holding the federal government accountable for its responsibilities in addressing the climate crisis. The deep ideological divide between the states and the Trump administration on environmental issues highlights the urgent need for evidence-based policymaking that prioritizes public health and the well-being of the planet.





