UN to Vote on Controversial Trump Peace Plan for Gaza

Proposed resolution aims to establish transitional authority and international force, but faces criticism over lack of Palestinian involvement.

Apr. 11, 2026 at 9:03am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A fractured, abstract painting in muted earth tones and deep blues, depicting an overlapping, geometric representation of a political symbol related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, conveying a sense of tension and unresolved issues.As the UN Security Council debates a controversial peace plan for Gaza, the region's long-standing political tensions are reflected in a dynamic, fragmented visual metaphor.NYC Today

The UN Security Council is set to vote on a US-proposed draft resolution that aims to lay the groundwork for President Trump's ambitious 20-point peace plan for Gaza. The resolution calls for establishing a transitional authority, known as the Board of Peace, which would be chaired by Trump himself and hold extensive governance powers. It also proposes deploying an International Stabilization Force (ISF) to disarm Hamas and maintain security. However, the plan has sparked intense debate, with Russia, China, and regional states pushing for amendments over concerns about the exclusion of Palestinian participation and endorsement.

Why it matters

The proposed resolution represents a pivotal moment in the long-standing conflict, as the international community grapples with finding a path to peace in the region. The plan's controversial elements, such as the unilateral transitional authority and the lack of formal Palestinian involvement, raise questions about its legitimacy and potential to achieve a lasting resolution.

The details

The latest draft of the resolution now includes a notional recognition of Palestinian self-determination, which may be enough to deter vetoes from China or Russia. However, many countries remain concerned about the resolution's details, particularly the extensive powers of the Board of Peace and the exclusion of the Israelis and Palestinians from the negotiations. Israel has strongly opposed language supporting Palestinian statehood and is presumed to have had a significant influence in shaping the text. Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority leader, has expressed broad support for the plan, but the absence of formal Palestinian involvement raises questions about its legitimacy.

  • The UN Security Council is set to vote on the resolution in New York.
  • The proposed resolution aims to build on Trump's previous ceasefire and peace deal.

The players

Donald Trump

The President of the United States, who has proposed the peace plan and would chair the Board of Peace transitional authority.

Mahmoud Abbas

The leader of the Palestinian Authority, who has expressed broad support for the plan despite the absence of formal Palestinian involvement.

United Nations Security Council

The international body that will vote on the proposed resolution.

Russia

A permanent member of the UN Security Council that has been pushing for amendments to the initial draft of the resolution.

China

A permanent member of the UN Security Council that has also been pushing for amendments to the initial draft of the resolution.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority leader, has expressed broad support for the plan, but the absence of formal Palestinian involvement raises questions about its legitimacy.”

— Mahmoud Abbas, Palestinian Authority leader

What’s next

The UN Security Council is set to vote on the proposed resolution in the coming days. If passed, the resolution would establish the Board of Peace transitional authority and deploy the International Stabilization Force to Gaza. However, the plan's lack of formal Palestinian involvement and concerns over its legality under international law could still pose significant challenges.

The takeaway

The proposed UN resolution on Trump's Gaza peace plan represents a high-stakes diplomatic effort to address the long-standing conflict in the region. However, the plan's controversial elements, such as the unilateral transitional authority and the exclusion of the Israelis and Palestinians from the negotiations, raise serious questions about its legitimacy and potential to achieve a lasting peace. The outcome of the UN Security Council vote will have far-reaching implications for the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.