Trump's Iran Exit Plan Faces GOP Rifts Exposed by War

Republican divisions emerge as president seeks off-ramp from conflict with Iran.

Apr. 10, 2026 at 9:18am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dimly lit, cinematic painting of a lone government building or political figure, with warm sunlight streaming through the windows and deep shadows obscuring details, conveying a sense of uncertainty and unease surrounding the Iran war's impact on the GOP.The Iran conflict casts a long shadow over the Republican Party, exposing deep divisions as the midterm elections loom.NYC Today

President Donald Trump's efforts to find an exit strategy from the war with Iran are facing growing criticism and divisions within the Republican Party. Some conservative figures have rejected the idea of negotiating with Iran, while others have called for Trump's removal from office over his handling of the conflict. Republican leaders in Congress have largely remained silent, as the rapidly evolving situation makes it difficult to address. The war has become a political liability for the GOP ahead of the midterm elections, with some hoping voters will have forgotten about it by November.

Why it matters

The rifts within the Republican Party over Trump's approach to the Iran conflict expose deeper tensions within the 'America First' coalition that propelled him to power. The party's traditional foreign policy hawks are at odds with the anti-interventionist wing, creating challenges for the president as he seeks a way out of the unpopular war.

The details

Trump's exit efforts, which have included both threats of annihilation and a tenuous ceasefire, have done little to heal the divisions within the Republican Party over the war. Conservative figures like activist Laura Loomer have rejected the idea of negotiating with Iran, while others like former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene have called for Trump's removal from office. Republican leaders in Congress have largely remained silent, concerned about how the war will play out politically. Some GOP strategists hope voters will have forgotten about the conflict by the time of the midterm elections, where the party already faces headwinds.

  • The ceasefire deal is expected to be a focus of talks starting on Saturday in Pakistan.
  • The 60-day deadline for Trump to seek congressional approval for the conflict is approaching at the end of April if the ceasefire does not hold.

The players

Laura Loomer

A conservative activist close to President Trump and often one of his top boosters, who rejected the notion of brokering a deal with Iran.

JD Vance

The Vice President, who is taking on a larger diplomatic role and is expected to lead the talks in Pakistan.

Marjorie Taylor Greene

A former Trump supporter-turned-critic who called for the president to be removed from office through the 25th Amendment.

Megyn Kelly

The former Fox News anchor who now hosts a podcast and unloaded on Trump with a profane critique.

Charlie Kirk

The host of 'The Charlie Kirk Show' who wondered what would end first, their episode or the ceasefire deal.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I support President Trump. I just don't believe in negotiating with Islamic terrorists.”

— Laura Loomer, Conservative Activist

“Can't he just behave like a normal human?”

— Megyn Kelly, Podcast Host

What’s next

The administration is seeking billions of dollars in additional spending for the war, setting up a vote that could put budget-conscious Republicans in a difficult spot before the fall campaigns. Democrats are also moving to force another vote on a war powers resolution that would curb Trump's options in Iran.

The takeaway

The divisions within the Republican Party over Trump's handling of the Iran conflict highlight the broader tensions within the 'America First' coalition, as the party's traditional foreign policy hawks clash with the anti-interventionist wing. This political liability could pose challenges for the GOP ahead of the midterm elections, where the party already faces headwinds.