New York Times Defends Reporter After Trump's 'Derisive' Response

The storied newspaper fires back after the president lashed out at one of its journalists over a question about potential war crimes.

Apr. 7, 2026 at 9:05am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dimly lit, cinematic painting of an empty government office, with warm sunlight streaming through the windows and deep shadows covering the walls, conveying a sense of tension and unease.The fraught relationship between the White House and the press corps is reflected in the shadows cast over an empty government office.NYC Today

The New York Times issued a statement criticizing President Donald Trump's 'derisive comments' made in response to a reporter's question about potential war crimes. The Times defended its journalist, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, and condemned Trump's dismissive reaction to the query.

Why it matters

This exchange highlights the ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and the mainstream media, particularly the New York Times, which has been a frequent target of the president's criticism. It also raises questions about the administration's stance on potential war crimes and human rights abuses.

The details

On Monday evening, the New York Times released a statement responding to Trump's remarks. The president had called the Times 'failing' and 'fake' after one of its reporters, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, asked about potential war crimes. In its statement, the Times defended Kanno-Youngs and condemned Trump's 'derisive comments' towards the journalist.

  • The exchange occurred on Monday evening.

The players

The New York Times

A prominent American newspaper known for its in-depth reporting and analysis.

Donald Trump

The 45th President of the United States, who has frequently criticized the New York Times and other mainstream media outlets.

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

A reporter for the New York Times who asked President Trump about potential war crimes.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and the mainstream media, particularly the New York Times, and raises questions about the administration's stance on potential war crimes and human rights abuses.