Federal Agencies Awarded Lucrative No-Bid Contracts

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The New York Times is looking into a series of lucrative no-bid federal contracts awarded by the Trump administration, particularly to companies with ties to the former president. The newspaper is asking the public to share information about any suspicious no-bid contracts they are aware of, as the system that polices these arrangements can be vulnerable to abuse.

Why it matters

No-bid or sole-source contracts are supposed to be used only in rare circumstances, but the lax oversight of this process has raised concerns about potential cronyism and misuse of taxpayer funds. The Times' investigation aims to shed light on how the Trump administration may have leveraged these contracts to benefit allies and political supporters.

The details

The Times reported that the Trump administration awarded several no-bid contracts for event planning work to a company that helped organize the January 6th rally. These contracts were given without soliciting bids from the hundreds of other federal contractors who provide similar services. Earlier this year, similar no-bid contracts also played a role in the political downfall of former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose department paid $220 million in work to companies tied to her and her allies.

• Last month, The New York Times reported on the no-bid contracts awarded by the Trump administration.
• Earlier this year, no-bid contracts were involved in the political downfall of former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

What’s next

The New York Times is asking the public to share information about any suspicious no-bid contracts they are aware of, as the newspaper continues its investigation into the potential abuse of these arrangements by the Trump administration.