Columnists Accused of Defeatism Over Iran Conflict

Commentators criticized for using 'quagmire' to describe situation despite Iran's military weaknesses.

Apr. 5, 2026 at 7:50pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Prominent political commentators have been accused of spreading defeatism in their coverage of the ongoing conflict with Iran, with some columnists using the word 'quagmire' to describe the situation despite Iran's dwindling military capabilities and resources.

Why it matters

The critical media coverage of the conflict with Iran has drawn comparisons to the propaganda tactics of former Iraqi information minister 'Baghdad Bob', who falsely claimed Iraq was winning the war even as the country was collapsing. This raises concerns about the media's role in shaping public perception of complex geopolitical events.

The details

The article cites examples of New York Times columnists using the term 'quagmire' to describe the conflict with Iran, despite the fact that Iran's military forces have been significantly weakened, with a declining navy, few missile launchers, and its nuclear program in disarray. The author argues this type of coverage is reminiscent of the propaganda tactics used by the former Iraqi information minister, who falsely claimed victory even as his country was being defeated.

  • The article was published on April 5, 2026.

The players

New York Times

A prominent American newspaper known for its in-depth political coverage.

The Guardian

A British daily newspaper with a global readership and reputation for progressive political commentary.

Baghdad Bob

The former Iraqi information minister known for his propagandistic and false claims of victory during the Iraq War.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“After a few short weeks, multiple New York Times columnists used the word 'quagmire' to describe Iran.”

— Andy Kessler, Author

“The president 'has lost his Iran war'.”

— The Guardian

The takeaway

This case highlights concerns about the media's role in shaping public perception of complex geopolitical events, and the potential dangers of defeatist or propagandistic coverage, even if unintentional.