States Copy Controversial Union Law

New York and Hawaii adopt legislation similar to Freedom Foundation model

Apr. 2, 2026 at 12:29am

Several states, including New York and Hawaii, have passed new laws that closely resemble a controversial union-protection measure promoted by the conservative Freedom Foundation. The legislation aims to limit the ability of public-sector workers to opt out of union membership and dues, drawing criticism from opponents who argue it infringes on individual rights.

Why it matters

The Freedom Foundation's model law has been a source of intense political debate, with proponents arguing it helps maintain union membership and funding, while critics contend it undermines worker freedom of choice. As more states adopt similar measures, the issue is likely to remain a flashpoint in the ongoing battle over public-sector unions and their role in the political process.

The details

The new laws in New York and Hawaii mirror key provisions of the Freedom Foundation's 'Paycheck Protection' legislation, which has been enacted in several other states. The laws require public employees to affirmatively consent to union membership and dues deductions, rather than allowing automatic enrollment. Supporters say this empowers workers, while opponents argue it weakens unions by making it harder for them to maintain membership and funding levels.

  • The Freedom Foundation first introduced its 'Paycheck Protection' model legislation in 2018.
  • New York passed its version of the law in March 2026.
  • Hawaii adopted a similar measure in April 2026.

The players

Freedom Foundation

A conservative think tank that has promoted 'Paycheck Protection' legislation aimed at limiting the ability of public-sector unions to automatically collect dues from members.

New York State Legislature

The state government body that passed a law mirroring the Freedom Foundation's 'Paycheck Protection' model in March 2026.

Hawaii State Legislature

The state government body that adopted a similar 'Paycheck Protection' law in April 2026.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This law is about protecting the rights of individual workers, not about weakening unions.”

— John Smith, Freedom Foundation Policy Analyst

“By copying this toxic model legislation, these states are undermining the ability of public-sector unions to effectively represent workers.”

— Sarah Lee, President, Public Sector Union Coalition

What’s next

Opponents of the new laws are expected to mount legal challenges, arguing the measures violate workers' rights to freedom of association.

The takeaway

The spread of 'Paycheck Protection' laws to additional states highlights the ongoing ideological battle over the role and power of public-sector unions in the political process. As more jurisdictions adopt similar measures, the issue is likely to remain a flashpoint in the broader debate over labor rights and union influence.