DOJ Deems Presidential Records Act Unconstitutional

Trump's records could remain out of reach as his administration argues the law exceeds Congress' powers.

Apr. 2, 2026 at 8:53pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dimly lit, cinematic government office space with a lone desk and chair, the warm sunlight streaming in through the windows casting deep shadows, creating a sense of political unease and the fragility of democratic institutions.The DOJ's controversial opinion on presidential records could have far-reaching implications for government transparency and accountability.NYC Today

The Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel has issued an opinion claiming that the Presidential Records Act, which requires presidents to turn over official records to the National Archives when leaving office, is unconstitutional. This opinion sets up a potential legal battle over whether former President Trump can keep his presidential records, including classified documents, from being archived.

Why it matters

The Presidential Records Act was enacted after the Watergate scandal to ensure transparency and accountability for presidential administrations. If the law is deemed unconstitutional, it could allow future presidents to unilaterally withhold their records from the public, undermining democratic oversight.

The details

In 2022, former President Trump initially refused to fully comply with the Presidential Records Act, forcing the National Archives to retrieve large quantities of records, including classified documents, from Mar-a-Lago. This led to a federal investigation and indictment that was later thrown out. Now, the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel has issued an opinion arguing the law exceeds Congress' powers and infringes on the autonomy of the presidency.

  • In 2022, the National Archives retrieved records from Mar-a-Lago after Trump initially refused to comply with the Presidential Records Act.
  • In 2023, a grand jury indicted Trump partially under the Espionage Act, but the case was thrown out in 2024.
  • On April 2, 2026, the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion declaring the Presidential Records Act unconstitutional.

The players

Donald Trump

The former president who initially refused to fully comply with the Presidential Records Act, leading to a federal investigation.

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

The DOJ division that issued an opinion declaring the Presidential Records Act unconstitutional.

National Archives

The government agency responsible for retrieving presidential records when a president leaves office.

Judge Aileen Cannon

The judge who threw out the federal indictment against Trump in 2024.

Jack Smith

The special counsel who investigated Trump's handling of classified documents.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The determination is a signal that the president will not turn over his documents to the archives.”

— T. Elliot Gaiser, Author of the DOJ opinion

“Sets Trump up to claim a right to take it all in 2029-esp if he really does issue a blanket declassification order 1st.”

— Charlie Savage, New York Times reporter

What’s next

The DOJ's opinion is likely to face legal challenges, as the Presidential Records Act has been in place for over 40 years. The outcome of any future court battles could have significant implications for presidential transparency and accountability.

The takeaway

This DOJ opinion represents a significant escalation in the ongoing battle over presidential records and could undermine the public's right to access information about their government. It highlights the need for robust legal frameworks to ensure the preservation of presidential records, even in the face of executive branch resistance.