Driven Brands Faces Securities Fraud Allegations Over Accounting Errors

Investors with losses urged to contact law firm by May 8 deadline

Apr. 1, 2026 at 10:33am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:DRVN) and certain of the Company's senior executives for securities fraud after the Company disclosed widespread accounting errors and internal control failures, causing its stock to drop nearly 40%.

Why it matters

The lawsuit alleges that Driven Brands made materially false and misleading statements about the accuracy of its financial reporting and the effectiveness of its internal controls, which led to a significant stock price decline when the accounting issues were revealed.

The details

The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Driven Brands common stock. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and is captioned Clark v. Driven Brands Holdings Inc., et al., 1:26-cv-01902.

  • The lead plaintiff deadline is May 8, 2026.
  • The alleged misconduct spans from 2023 to 2025.
  • On February 25, 2026, Driven Brands' stock dropped 39.8% after the company disclosed the accounting errors and internal control failures.

The players

Driven Brands Holdings Inc.

An automotive aftermarket services company that owns, operates, and franchises vehicle maintenance, repair, collision, glass, and car wash brands.

Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP

The leading securities law firm representing plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit against Driven Brands.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“If you invested in Driven Brands, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/driven-brands-class-action-lawsuit.”

— Adam McCall, Attorney

What’s next

Investors have until May 8, 2026, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case.

The takeaway

This case highlights the importance of accurate financial reporting and effective internal controls for publicly traded companies, as well as the potential consequences for shareholders when these issues are not properly addressed.