Connecticut Dems Require IDs for Recycling, Reject Voter ID

State Democrats pass law demanding IDs to recycle cans, but oppose GOP efforts to verify citizenship at polls

Mar. 22, 2026 at 1:11am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Connecticut Democrats recently passed an emergency law requiring people to present a copy of their driver's license when recycling more than 1,000 cans or bottles per day, citing issues with non-residents taking advantage of the state's higher bottle return rate. However, the state still does not require residents to show any form of ID when voting, drawing criticism from Republicans who argue the party is being hypocritical on voter integrity measures.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing partisan debate over voter ID laws, with Democrats arguing such measures disproportionately burden certain communities while Republicans contend they are necessary to ensure election integrity. The Connecticut example shows how the same party can take different stances on ID requirements depending on the context, raising questions about the consistency of their positions.

The details

Connecticut's new law, passed in late February, requires people recycling more than 1,000 cans or bottles per day to provide a copy of their driver's license. This was done to address issues with non-residents crossing state borders to take advantage of Connecticut's 10-cent bottle return rate, which was reportedly causing the state to lose significant revenue. Meanwhile, the state still does not require any form of ID to vote, with residents only needing to attest to their U.S. citizenship under penalty of law.

  • The emergency certification bill, SB 299, was introduced by top Democratic leaders in late February 2026.
  • The bill was passed in both chambers of the Connecticut legislature and signed into law by Gov. Ned Lamont on March 3, 2026.

The players

Ned Lamont

The Democratic governor of Connecticut who signed the bottle recycling ID law.

Richard Blumenthal

A Democratic U.S. Senator from Connecticut who voted against advancing the SAVE Act, which would have imposed stricter voter ID requirements.

Chris Murphy

A Democratic U.S. Senator from Connecticut who also voted against advancing the SAVE Act.

Anna Pingel

The Campaign Director for Secure Elections at the America First Policy Institute, who criticized the Connecticut Democrats' stance on voter ID.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“In Connecticut, it seems that they are committed to securing recycling, but not to securing elections. Requiring photo ID to collect cash from recycling but opposing photo ID to cast a vote tells you everything you need to know about the hypocrisy of politicians fighting against commonsense legislation like the SAVE Act. What is more important to safeguard—bottles or ballots?”

— Anna Pingel, Campaign Director for Secure Elections, America First Policy Institute

“Let's be very clear: the SAVE America Act requires a birth certificate or passport to register to vote, which Republicans know 21 million Americans do not have. This is not a voter identification bill. It is a voter purge bill.”

— Richard Blumenthal, U.S. Senator

What’s next

The Senate will continue holding weekend sessions as the deadlock over the SAVE Act continues, with Democrats opposing the stricter voter ID requirements.

The takeaway

This case highlights the partisan divide over voter ID laws, with Democrats arguing they disproportionately burden certain communities while Republicans contend they are necessary to ensure election integrity. The Connecticut example shows how the same party can take different stances on ID requirements depending on the context, raising questions about the consistency of their positions on this issue.