Justice Department and Live Nation Reach Settlement in Antitrust Case

The agreement would allow Live Nation to avoid a breakup, but some states object to the terms.

Published on Mar. 9, 2026

The Justice Department has reached a tentative settlement with Live Nation, the concert giant that includes Ticketmaster, in an antitrust lawsuit. Under the terms, Live Nation would agree to changes in how it makes ticketing deals with venues and allow touring artists to use other promoters. Live Nation would also pay financial damages to the states involved in the lawsuit. However, some states have objected to the settlement terms and say they will continue the case.

Why it matters

The case has drawn bipartisan political scrutiny over concerns about Live Nation's dominance in the live music industry and its impact on ticket prices and competition. The settlement, if approved, would allow Live Nation to avoid a potentially severe outcome like a breakup of the company, which some had sought.

The details

The settlement would require Live Nation to allow venues to use multiple ticket vendors, not just Ticketmaster, and let artists use other promoters. Live Nation would also pay financial damages to the states involved. However, some states have objected to the terms, saying they will continue the case independently.

  • The Justice Department and Live Nation reached the tentative settlement on Thursday, March 6, 2026.
  • The settlement was discussed in open court on Monday, March 9, 2026.

The players

Live Nation

A concert giant that includes Ticketmaster, the dominant ticket seller in the live music industry.

Justice Department

The U.S. government agency that filed an antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation in 2024.

Letitia James

The New York Attorney General, who said New York will continue the case against Live Nation without the federal government.

Arun Subramanian

The judge overseeing the case, who expressed anger about how the settlement was reported.

Michael Rapino

The longtime CEO of Live Nation.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We will keep fighting this case without the federal government, so that we can secure justice for all those harmed by Live Nation's monopoly.”

— Letitia James, New York Attorney General (New York Times)

“It shows absolute disrespect for the court, the jury and this entire process. It is absolutely unacceptable.”

— Arun Subramanian, Judge overseeing the case (New York Times)

What’s next

Judge Subramanian said he expects Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino and the acting head of the Justice Department's antitrust division to be in court on Tuesday to discuss the settlement agreement.

The takeaway

The settlement, if approved, would allow Live Nation to avoid a potentially severe outcome like a breakup, but some states have objected, saying they will continue the case to secure justice for those harmed by Live Nation's alleged monopolistic practices.