- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
House narrowly rejects Iran war powers resolution
Early test of Trump's strategy as conflict with Iran widens
Published on Mar. 6, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The House narrowly rejected a war powers resolution to halt President Donald Trump's attacks on Iran, an early sign of unease in Congress over the rapidly widening conflict that is reordering U.S. priorities at home and abroad. The vote was 212-219, with Republicans largely backing Trump and most Democrats opposing the war.
Why it matters
The vote provided a clarifying snapshot of political support for, and opposition to, the U.S.-Israel military operation against Iran and Trump's rationale for bypassing Congress, which alone has the power to declare war. The conflict has quickly carried echoes of the long wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, with many Sept. 11-era veterans now serving in Congress.
The details
While views in Congress are largely falling along party lines, there are crossover coalitions. The war powers resolution, if signed into law, would have immediately halted Trump's ability to conduct the war unless Congress approved the military action. The president would likely veto it. Trump administration officials spent hours behind closed doors on Capitol Hill this week trying to reassure lawmakers that they have the situation under control, but have provided a shifting rationale for the war.
- The House vote took place on Thursday, March 6, 2026.
- The Senate defeated a similar measure along party lines a day earlier.
The players
Donald Trump
The President of the United States who launched the surprise attack against Iran.
Rep. Gregory Meeks
The top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee who argued that Trump must come to Congress to make the case for war.
Rep. Brian Mast
A Republican congressman from Florida and chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee who publicly thanked Trump for taking action against Iran.
Rep. Jamie Raskin
A Democratic congressman from Maryland who argued that the Constitution is clear that only Congress can decide matters of war.
Rep. Thomas Massie
A Republican congressman from Kentucky who said the administration "can't even give us a straight answer" on why the war was launched.
What they’re saying
“Donald Trump is not a king, and if he believes the war with Iran is in our national interest, then he must come to Congress and make the case.”
— Rep. Gregory Meeks, Top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee (wbal.com)
“The framers weren't fooling around. It's up to us.”
— Rep. Jamie Raskin, Democratic congressman from Maryland (wbal.com)
“This administration can't even give us a straight answer of as to why we launched this preemptive war.”
— Rep. Thomas Massie, Republican congressman from Kentucky (wbal.com)
What’s next
The president would likely veto the war powers resolution if it had passed Congress.
The takeaway
The narrow House vote highlighted the deep partisan divide in Congress over Trump's decision to attack Iran, with Republicans largely backing the president and most Democrats opposing the war. The conflict is testing the balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches.
New York top stories
New York events
Mar. 9, 2026
Banksy Museum - FlexiticketMar. 9, 2026
The Great GatsbyMar. 9, 2026
The Play That Goes Wrong



