Iraq War Vet Dems Blast 'Chicken Hawks' Over Iran Strikes

Lawmakers who served in combat criticize those who haven't for rhetoric on ongoing conflict

Published on Mar. 5, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A Democratic Party representative who served in the Iraq war has issued a statement denouncing the rhetoric around the ongoing strikes on Iran. New York Democrat Rep. Pat Ryan, a veteran who twice served in Iraq, expressed concern over the current Iran situation, saying he will "lose my mind" if he hears "one more chicken hawk who's never served a single day in uniform" talk tough about the conflict. Fellow representatives backed Ryan's comments, with Rep. Eugene Vindman calling the conflict with Iran an unnecessary use of US resources.

Why it matters

The criticism from veteran lawmakers highlights the divide between those who have experienced combat and those who have not, as the U.S. engages in a new military conflict. It also raises questions about the decision-making process behind the strikes on Iran and whether the administration has fully considered the implications.

The details

Donald Trump approved a bombing campaign against Iran earlier this week, prompting concerns from veteran lawmakers currently serving in government. Rep. Pat Ryan, who served twice in Iraq, issued a statement denouncing the rhetoric from "chicken hawks" who have never been in uniform. Rep. Eugene Vindman also criticized the conflict, saying wars are easy to start but hard to finish and that this was an unnecessary use of U.S. resources.

  • On March 5, 2026, Rep. Pat Ryan issued his statement criticizing "chicken hawks" over the Iran strikes.

The players

Rep. Pat Ryan

A Democratic Party representative who served twice in the Iraq war.

Rep. Eugene Vindman

A fellow Democratic representative who criticized the conflict with Iran as an unnecessary use of U.S. resources.

Donald Trump

The U.S. President who approved the bombing campaign against Iran earlier this week.

John Bolton

The president's national security advisor during his first administration, who expressed concerns that Trump hasn't thought through the implications of the strikes.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“If I hear one more chicken hawk who's never served a single day in uniform sitting in a gold-plated office in DC or Mar-a-Lago or anywhere else, try to talk tough having never seen what war is about, I'm going to lose my mind.”

— Rep. Pat Ryan, Democratic Party representative (CNN)

“I will not be shedding a tear for the Iranian regime and the Ayatollah. I understand the threat but I also understand that wars are easy to start and hard to finish. This is a commitment of American blood and treasure to a conflict that we didn't need to be engaged in.”

— Rep. Eugene Vindman, Democratic representative (CNN)

“As long as things are going successfully, he'll stick with it. If we run into real difficulty, and I hope we don't, and we shouldn't at this point, but if we do, because anything is possible, that would be the testing time to see whether he was able to stick it out.”

— John Bolton, Former national security advisor (The Daily Beast Podcast)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.