- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Democrats Accused of Lying to Public About Trump's Iran Strikes
Partisan critics claim Trump violated Constitution, but past presidents have taken military action without Congress' approval
Published on Mar. 4, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Democrats are criticizing President Trump's recent military strikes against Iran, accusing him of violating the Constitution by not first seeking Congressional approval. However, the article argues that past presidents from both parties have taken military action without a formal declaration of war, and that the Constitution gives the president broad authority as commander-in-chief to act with "secrecy and dispatch." The article contends that Democrats are "knowingly lying to the public" and "impairing Trump's stature abroad" with their partisan attacks.
Why it matters
This debate over the president's war powers highlights the ongoing tensions between the executive and legislative branches over the use of military force. It also reflects the highly partisan nature of foreign policy discussions, with Democrats accused of prioritizing political attacks over national security concerns.
The details
The article notes that the US Senate is set to vote on a resolution aimed at restricting Trump's ability to take further military action against Iran. However, the author argues this would violate the president's constitutional authority as commander-in-chief. The article cites examples of past presidents from both parties launching military operations without first obtaining Congressional approval, such as Harry Truman in Korea, Lyndon Johnson in Vietnam, and Barack Obama in Libya.
- The US Senate is set to vote on the resolution on Wednesday.
The players
President Donald Trump
The current President of the United States who ordered the recent military strikes against Iran.
Nancy Pelosi
A Democratic Congresswoman who criticized Trump for "ignoring the Constitution" with the Iran strikes.
Chris Murphy
A Democratic Senator who accused Trump of being a "would-be dictator" who "cares nothing about our sacred Constitution."
What they’re saying
“It's clear as day this president is violating the Constitution.”
— Chris Murphy, Senator (nypost.com)
“Trump 'ignored the Constitution.'”
— Nancy Pelosi, Congresswoman (nypost.com)
What’s next
The US Senate is set to vote on the resolution aimed at restricting Trump's ability to take further military action against Iran on Wednesday.
The takeaway
This debate over the president's war powers highlights the ongoing partisan tensions over foreign policy, with Democrats accused of prioritizing political attacks over national security concerns. However, the Constitution grants the president broad authority as commander-in-chief, and past presidents from both parties have taken military action without first obtaining Congressional approval.
New York top stories
New York events
Mar. 9, 2026
Banksy Museum - FlexiticketMar. 9, 2026
The Great GatsbyMar. 9, 2026
The Play That Goes Wrong



