Supreme Court Preserves GOP-Held NYC Congressional District

Ruling halts redrawing of district held by Rep. Nicole Malliotakis despite claims of unfairness to minority voters

Published on Mar. 3, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Supreme Court has sided with Republicans in ruling that the boundaries of the only GOP-held congressional district in New York City do not need to be redrawn for the 2026 elections, despite a lower court ruling that the district is unfair to Black and Hispanic residents. The conservative majority halted the state court's order to redraw the district held by Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, which covers Staten Island and part of Brooklyn.

Why it matters

The outcome is a victory for Republicans in the national battle over redistricting, which could determine control of the closely divided House of Representatives. Democrats had argued the district should be reshaped to give more voting power to the growing population of Black and Hispanic residents on Staten Island.

The details

A judge had ruled that the district was drawn in a way that dilutes the power of its Black and Hispanic voters and ordered the state's Independent Redistricting Commission to complete a new map. However, the Supreme Court sided with Republicans and the Trump administration, who had sought the high court's intervention. Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the judge's ruling amounted to 'unadorned racial discrimination' in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

  • The Supreme Court ruling came on Monday, March 3, 2026.
  • Qualifying for congressional elections in New York began last week.

The players

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis

The Republican representative who holds the only GOP-held congressional district in New York City.

New York's Independent Redistricting Commission

The bipartisan commission tasked with redrawing the state's congressional maps.

Justice Samuel Alito

The Supreme Court justice who wrote that the lower court's ruling amounted to 'unadorned racial discrimination'.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor

The Supreme Court justice who objected to the court's decision to intervene in the case.

Ed Cox

The New York State Republican Party Chairman who praised the Supreme Court order and criticized Democratic leaders.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I thank the Justices who stopped the voters on Staten Island and in Southern Brooklyn from being stripped of their ability to elect a representative who reflects their values.”

— Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (Statement)

“Time and again, this Court has said that federal courts should not meddle with state election laws ahead of an election. … Ignoring every limit on federal courts' authority, the Court takes the unprecedented step of staying a state trial court's decision in a redistricting dispute on matters of state law without giving the State's highest court a chance to act.”

— Justice Sonia Sotomayor (Dissenting opinion)

What’s next

The judge's ruling that the district was unfairly drawn will likely continue to be challenged, and the state's Independent Redistricting Commission may still propose new maps for the 2028 elections.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing partisan battle over redistricting and the Supreme Court's willingness to intervene in state-level disputes, even when it means preserving a congressional district that a lower court found to be unfair to minority voters.