Shell Loses Bid to Void Venture Global LNG Arbitration Ruling

New York court rejects Shell's attempt to overturn arbitration decision in LNG supply dispute.

Mar. 3, 2026 at 1:55am

A New York state judge recently sided with Venture Global, rejecting Shell's attempt to overturn an arbitration ruling related to a dispute over liquefied natural gas (LNG) deliveries. The judge dismissed Shell's claims of fraud and misconduct, emphasizing the court's deference to the initial arbitration decision.

Why it matters

This case highlights the increasing reliance on arbitration in the energy sector and the high hurdle for overturning arbitration awards in court. It also underscores the need for robust contract language to address unforeseen events like the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on global LNG markets.

The details

The dispute centered around Venture Global's alleged failure to supply LNG cargoes to Shell as agreed upon in their contracts. Shell argued that Venture Global intentionally delayed the start of commercial operations at its Calcasieu Pass facility in Louisiana to capitalize on higher spot market prices following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. However, the judge determined that no further investigation was needed, dismissing Shell's claims as 'pure speculation' and requiring 'clear and convincing evidence' which was not presented.

  • The Calcasieu Pass facility began commercial operations in April 2025, later than the originally planned October 2022.
  • Shell initiated arbitration claims against Venture Global in 2023.

The players

Venture Global

A liquefied natural gas (LNG) company.

Shell

A multinational oil and gas company.

Justice Joel Cohen

The New York state judge who ruled in favor of Venture Global.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident

What’s next

Several energy companies initiated arbitration claims against Venture Global in 2023, indicating that similar disputes may continue to emerge as the LNG market evolves.

The takeaway

This case highlights the increasing reliance on arbitration in the energy sector and the need for robust contract language to address unforeseen events like the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on global LNG markets.