- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Trump's 'Weaponization' Effort Fails to Prosecute Enemies
Ideological divisions and missteps undermine DOJ's push to target Trump's political foes
Apr. 6, 2026 at 10:06pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The DOJ's failed efforts to prosecute Trump's political enemies expose the challenges of weaponizing federal law enforcement for partisan gain.Manhattan TodayPresident Donald Trump vowed to go after his perceived enemies in a second term, creating a 'weaponization working group' within the Justice Department. But the effort has largely failed, plagued by internal clashes, lack of evidence, and legal setbacks, as the DOJ struggles to build viable cases against Trump's political opponents.
Why it matters
Trump's push to use the DOJ to prosecute his political enemies represents a concerning erosion of the department's independence and a potential abuse of power. The failure of the 'weaponization' effort highlights the importance of maintaining the rule of law and the integrity of federal law enforcement, even under a president determined to settle scores.
The details
The 'weaponization working group' was led by Trump allies like Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and lawyer Ed Martin, who prepared for the role by reading about the Italian Mafia. They divided DOJ leadership into 'competent and incompetent villains' and targeted figures like Special Counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, and NY Attorney General Letitia James. However, the group's efforts have largely fallen flat, with cases against James Comey and Rep. Adam Schiff failing to move forward. Blanche has grown 'dismayed' by the group's inability to secure convictions, while Trump has expressed frustration at the lack of 'perp walks' of his perceived enemies.
- In his second term, Trump vowed to go after foes he claimed 'weaponized' the government against him.
- The 'weaponization working group' was created within the DOJ after Trump took office in 2025.
The players
Donald Trump
The former president who vowed to prosecute his political enemies in a second term.
Todd Blanche
The Deputy Attorney General who officially oversaw the 'weaponization working group' efforts, but grew 'dismayed' by the group's inability to secure convictions.
Ed Martin
A lawyer who took over the day-to-day efforts of the 'weaponization working group', preparing by reading about the Italian Mafia.
Jack Smith
The special counsel who twice indicted Trump and was a target of the 'weaponization' efforts.
Alvin Bragg
The Manhattan district attorney who convicted Trump and was a target of the 'weaponization' efforts.
What they’re saying
“The term 'weaponization' was one of Trump's rhetorical tricks, a fancy way of saying 'I know you are, but what am I?'”
— Andrew Rice, Writer, New York Magazine
“That's how big wins end up as gigantic, embarrassing losses.”
— Source familiar with Blanche's thinking
“Everybody's afraid that in the next administration, if we don't win, we're going to all be investigated and indicted. And why are they afraid? Because that's exactly what happened during the last administration.”
— Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General
What’s next
The DOJ's 'weaponization working group' continues to pursue cases against Trump's perceived enemies, but its efforts have so far been largely unsuccessful. It remains to be seen if the group can build any viable prosecutions or if the initiative will continue to falter.
The takeaway
Trump's attempt to use the DOJ to target his political opponents has exposed deep ideological divides within the department and a lack of evidence to support the 'weaponization' claims. The failure of this effort underscores the importance of maintaining the independence and integrity of federal law enforcement, even under a president determined to settle scores.


