Trump's 'Weaponization' Effort Fails to Prosecute Enemies

Ideological divisions and missteps undermine DOJ's push to target Trump's political foes

Apr. 6, 2026 at 10:06pm

A dimly lit, cinematic painting of a government building or political object, with warm sunlight casting dramatic shadows across the scene, conveying a sense of tension and unease around the politicization of the justice system.The DOJ's failed efforts to prosecute Trump's political enemies expose the challenges of weaponizing federal law enforcement for partisan gain.Manhattan Today

President Donald Trump vowed to go after his perceived enemies in a second term, creating a 'weaponization working group' within the Justice Department. But the effort has largely failed, plagued by internal clashes, lack of evidence, and legal setbacks, as the DOJ struggles to build viable cases against Trump's political opponents.

Why it matters

Trump's push to use the DOJ to prosecute his political enemies represents a concerning erosion of the department's independence and a potential abuse of power. The failure of the 'weaponization' effort highlights the importance of maintaining the rule of law and the integrity of federal law enforcement, even under a president determined to settle scores.

The details

The 'weaponization working group' was led by Trump allies like Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and lawyer Ed Martin, who prepared for the role by reading about the Italian Mafia. They divided DOJ leadership into 'competent and incompetent villains' and targeted figures like Special Counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, and NY Attorney General Letitia James. However, the group's efforts have largely fallen flat, with cases against James Comey and Rep. Adam Schiff failing to move forward. Blanche has grown 'dismayed' by the group's inability to secure convictions, while Trump has expressed frustration at the lack of 'perp walks' of his perceived enemies.

  • In his second term, Trump vowed to go after foes he claimed 'weaponized' the government against him.
  • The 'weaponization working group' was created within the DOJ after Trump took office in 2025.

The players

Donald Trump

The former president who vowed to prosecute his political enemies in a second term.

Todd Blanche

The Deputy Attorney General who officially oversaw the 'weaponization working group' efforts, but grew 'dismayed' by the group's inability to secure convictions.

Ed Martin

A lawyer who took over the day-to-day efforts of the 'weaponization working group', preparing by reading about the Italian Mafia.

Jack Smith

The special counsel who twice indicted Trump and was a target of the 'weaponization' efforts.

Alvin Bragg

The Manhattan district attorney who convicted Trump and was a target of the 'weaponization' efforts.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The term 'weaponization' was one of Trump's rhetorical tricks, a fancy way of saying 'I know you are, but what am I?'”

— Andrew Rice, Writer, New York Magazine

“That's how big wins end up as gigantic, embarrassing losses.”

— Source familiar with Blanche's thinking

“Everybody's afraid that in the next administration, if we don't win, we're going to all be investigated and indicted. And why are they afraid? Because that's exactly what happened during the last administration.”

— Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General

What’s next

The DOJ's 'weaponization working group' continues to pursue cases against Trump's perceived enemies, but its efforts have so far been largely unsuccessful. It remains to be seen if the group can build any viable prosecutions or if the initiative will continue to falter.

The takeaway

Trump's attempt to use the DOJ to target his political opponents has exposed deep ideological divides within the department and a lack of evidence to support the 'weaponization' claims. The failure of this effort underscores the importance of maintaining the independence and integrity of federal law enforcement, even under a president determined to settle scores.