Encyclopedia Britannica Sues OpenAI Over AI Training Data

Lawsuit alleges ChatGPT 'cannibalizes' Britannica's traffic by copying its content

Mar. 16, 2026 at 10:10pm

Encyclopedia Britannica and its subsidiary Merriam-Webster have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, accusing it of copyright infringement. The complaint alleges that OpenAI has pilfered Britannica's content, including nearly 100,000 online articles, to train its AI models and generate answers that 'copy or mimic, sometimes verbatim,' Britannica's material. The encyclopedia is seeking damages and restitution of profits, and is asking the court to stop OpenAI from engaging in the alleged unlawful conduct.

Why it matters

This lawsuit is the latest in a series of copyright fights that OpenAI has faced, with media outlets and authors also accusing the company of using their content to train AI models without permission. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how AI companies can use copyrighted material to develop their products.

The details

Britannica claims that OpenAI has been 'free-riding on the encyclopedia's and dictionary's trusted, high-quality content' while 'cannibalizing traffic' to their websites. The company alleges that the ChatGPT chatbot has attributed AI hallucinations to Britannica, further damaging the encyclopedia's reputation. Britannica is seeking damages, restitution of profits, and a court order to stop OpenAI from engaging in the alleged unlawful conduct.

  • Britannica filed the lawsuit in federal court in Manhattan on Friday, March 15, 2026.

The players

Encyclopedia Britannica

The publisher of the world's longest-running English-language encyclopedia.

Merriam-Webster

A subsidiary of Encyclopedia Britannica and a leading dictionary publisher.

OpenAI

The company behind the ChatGPT AI chatbot, which Britannica alleges has been copying its content.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.