- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Judge Rejects Live Nation Bid to Dismiss Antitrust Suit
Live Nation shares fell 3.1% after the ruling against the company's attempt to dismiss the lawsuit.
Published on Feb. 22, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A federal judge has rejected Live Nation Entertainment's bid to dismiss a lawsuit by the federal government and many states accusing the company of violating antitrust law by trying to dominate the live concert industry and inflate prices.
Why it matters
This ruling is a significant setback for Live Nation, one of the largest concert promotion and ticketing companies in the world. The antitrust lawsuit alleges that Live Nation has used its market power to stifle competition and drive up ticket prices for consumers.
The details
U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, a Biden appointee, rejected Live Nation's motion to dismiss the lawsuit in a decision on Wednesday. Live Nation shares fell 3.1% in after-hours trading following the ruling.
- The lawsuit was filed in 2026.
The players
Live Nation Entertainment
One of the largest concert promotion and ticketing companies in the world.
U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian
The federal judge who rejected Live Nation's bid to dismiss the antitrust lawsuit.
The takeaway
This ruling is a significant victory for the federal government and states in their efforts to rein in Live Nation's alleged anticompetitive practices in the live music industry. It sets the stage for a high-stakes legal battle over the company's market dominance and its impact on ticket prices for consumers.


