Penn Holds Off Cornell's Second-Half Rally for 91-81 Victory

The Quakers' efficient shooting and free throw performance proved decisive against the Big Red's late comeback attempt.

Published on Jan. 31, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Penn shot better than 55% from the field and led by as many as 23 points in the first half, but Cornell clawed back to within two points in the second half before the Quakers closed out the 91-81 victory. Michael Zanoni led Penn with 19 points, while Cooper Noard scored 28 points for Cornell in the losing effort.

Why it matters

This game highlighted the contrasting styles and strengths of the two Ivy League programs, with Penn's offensive efficiency and ability to get to the free throw line proving the difference against Cornell's second-half rally fueled by its perimeter shooting.

The details

Penn built a 49-35 halftime lead behind 8-of-15 shooting from 3-point range, led by 26 combined points from Michael Zanoni and Ethan Roberts. Cornell responded in the second half, with senior Cooper Noard sparking a surge that trimmed the deficit to just two points. However, Penn answered each Cornell push with timely baskets and free throws, closing the game by converting 19-of-25 attempts at the line.

  • Penn led by as many as 23 points in the first half.
  • Cornell pulled within 49-35 at halftime.
  • Cornell trimmed the deficit to 69-67 with 7:30 remaining in the second half.

The players

Michael Zanoni

Penn's leading scorer with 19 points on 6-of-9 shooting.

Ethan Roberts

Penn guard who added 17 points and 5 assists.

Cooper Noard

Cornell's senior guard who scored a game-high 28 points, including 6 3-pointers.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

What’s next

Cornell will look to avenge this loss when they travel to face Columbia on February 7th.

The takeaway

This game showcased the contrasting strengths of the two Ivy League programs, with Penn's offensive efficiency and ability to get to the free throw line proving the difference against Cornell's late comeback attempt fueled by its perimeter shooting.