- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Geneva Today
By the People, for the People
UN Experts Alarmed by Historic Guatemala Adoptions
Allegations of illegal adoptions of Indigenous children raise concerns over state involvement.
Feb. 18, 2026 at 4:47am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
UN experts have expressed grave concerns over allegations that at least 80 Indigenous children in Guatemala were subjected to illegal intercountry adoptions after being institutionalized at the "Hogar Temporal Elisa Martínez" following their capture and enforced disappearance between 1968 and 1996. The experts called for independent investigations into the alleged involvement of some state authorities, including the current Attorney General, in these illegal adoption processes.
Why it matters
The allegations of illegal adoptions and state involvement raise serious human rights concerns, as such practices violate international laws and deprive Indigenous families of their children. Prompt and thorough investigations are crucial to ensure justice and reparations for the victims and their families.
The details
According to the UN experts, the illegal adoptions may have involved a range of illicit acts, including fraud in the declaration of adoptability, falsification of official documents, coercion or lack of free and informed consent of biological parents, and improper financial gain for intermediaries. The experts specifically called for investigations into the alleged involvement of former Director/Administrator María Consuelo Porras Argueta, who reportedly served as the children's "legal guardian" during the period of the alleged adoptions.
- The alleged illegal adoptions occurred between 1968 and 1996.
- Porras Argueta reportedly served as the children's "legal guardian" from January 21 to August 30, 1982.
The players
María Consuelo Porras Argueta
Former Director/Administrator of the "Hogar Temporal Elisa Martínez" and current Attorney General and Head of the Public Prosecutor's Office of Guatemala, who reportedly served as the children's "legal guardian" during the alleged illegal adoptions.
UN Experts
A group of independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations to investigate and address the allegations of illegal adoptions in Guatemala.
What they’re saying
“We are particularly troubled that no prompt, thorough, independent and impartial investigation has been conducted into the alleged involvement of some State authorities in these processes and that mothers affected by these illegal adoptions have reportedly not received adequate recognition or reparations.”
— UN Experts
“All individuals against whom there are credible allegations of conduct incompatible with human rights standards, especially those who have held decision-making authority relevant to criminalisation or human rights violations, should not be shortlisted or appointed pending independent and thorough investigation of those allegations”
— UN Experts
What’s next
The experts noted that Porras Argueta is currently running for election to the Constitutional Court and may run for re-election as Attorney General this week. They urged all actors to exercise caution in view of the serious allegations that are yet to be investigated.
The takeaway
The allegations of illegal adoptions of Indigenous children in Guatemala and the potential involvement of state authorities highlight the urgent need for prompt, thorough, and independent investigations to ensure justice, accountability, and reparations for the victims and their families. This case underscores the importance of upholding human rights standards and preventing such violations from occurring in the future.


