Janus Henderson and Cannae Compared: Which Finance Firm Comes Out on Top?

An analysis of the two finance companies' performance, valuation, and investment strategies.

Published on Feb. 16, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:JHG) and Cannae (NYSE:CNNE) are both finance companies, but which one is the better business? This article compares the two firms across factors like risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, and profitability to determine which is the stronger investment.

Why it matters

Investors looking to gain exposure to the finance sector have two interesting options in Janus Henderson and Cannae. Understanding the relative strengths and weaknesses of each company can help inform investment decisions and provide insight into the broader trends shaping the finance industry.

The details

The analysis finds that Cannae has a lower beta of 1.09 compared to Janus Henderson's 1.54, indicating it is less volatile than the broader market. Cannae also has a higher potential upside according to analyst price targets. In terms of profitability, Janus Henderson edges out Cannae on metrics like net margins and return on equity. However, Cannae pays a higher dividend yield of 4.5% compared to Janus Henderson's 3.3%. Institutional ownership is strong for both firms, at over 88%.

  • The analysis is based on data as of February 16, 2026.

The players

Janus Henderson Group

An asset management holding company that provides services to institutional, retail, and high net worth clients through its subsidiaries.

Cannae Holdings

A principal investment firm that takes both minority and majority stakes in companies across sectors like restaurants, healthcare services, and financial services.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

This analysis highlights the different investment approaches and strengths of Janus Henderson and Cannae. Investors will need to weigh factors like risk, dividends, and growth potential to determine which finance firm best fits their portfolio and investment objectives.