- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Albuquerque Attorney Defends Cesar Chavez's Legacy Amid Removal Calls
Marquez argues allegations against civil rights icon lack merit and removing his name erases Hispanic history.
Mar. 29, 2026 at 8:51am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Albuquerque attorney Richard R. Marquez has penned an op-ed defending the legacy of civil rights pioneer Cesar Chavez amid recent calls to remove his name from landmarks. Marquez argues the allegations against Chavez, who died in 1993, lack merit and credibility, and that removing his name amounts to the public erasure of a strong Hispanic man. He criticizes Hispanic and Chicano leaders for failing to defend Chavez and accuses them of abandoning him for political gain.
Why it matters
The debate over Cesar Chavez's legacy reflects broader tensions around preserving Hispanic history and representation, especially in the Southwest. Chavez was a towering figure in the Chicano civil rights movement, and removing his name from landmarks would be seen by many as an erasure of that history and the struggles of farmworkers and the Hispanic community.
The details
Marquez's op-ed pushes back against recent allegations made against Chavez, which he says lack public scrutiny and the ability for Chavez to defend himself since he died over 30 years ago. Marquez criticizes Hispanic and Chicano leaders for failing to stand up for Chavez, accusing them of being 'weak' and more interested in 'looking politically correct' than defending the Spanish people's history. He argues that removing Chavez's name from landmarks would amount to erasing Hispanic history, drawing parallels to the removal of Juan De Oñate from schools and roads in New Mexico.
- Cesar Chavez died in 1993.
- The current allegations against Chavez were allegedly committed in the 1960s and 1970s.
The players
Richard R. Marquez
An Albuquerque-based attorney who wrote the op-ed defending Cesar Chavez's legacy.
Cesar Chavez
A famed civil rights pioneer who devoted his life to fighting for social, political and economic justice, especially for farmworkers.
Dolores Huerta
A farmworker activist who has alleged she was abused by Chavez because she gave birth to two of his children.
Juan De Oñate
A Spanish colonial governor who has had his name removed from schools, roads and landmarks in New Mexico.
What they’re saying
“The current hysteria is based on allegations that were allegedly committed in the 1960s and 1970s. None of these allegations have been held up to public scrutiny or close cross-examination.”
— Richard R. Marquez, Attorney
“Removing his name from any landmark in New Mexico or the U.S. amounts to the public erasure of a strong Hispanic man.”
— Richard R. Marquez, Attorney
“The Hispanic and Chicano leaders of New Mexico failed to stop this erasure from history and allowed the removal. They did this because they are weak and more interested in looking politically correct.”
— Richard R. Marquez, Attorney
The takeaway
This debate over Cesar Chavez's legacy reflects the ongoing struggle to preserve Hispanic history and representation, especially in the Southwest. Removing Chavez's name from landmarks would be seen by many as an erasure of his pivotal role in the Chicano civil rights movement and the broader Hispanic community's struggles. Marquez's op-ed underscores the need for Hispanic and Chicano leaders to stand up and defend this important historical figure.


