New Jersey Attorney General Won't Appeal Dismissal of Norcross Indictment

The decision ends a nearly two-year legal battle over corruption charges against a powerful South Jersey political figure.

Published on Feb. 20, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The New Jersey Attorney General's Office has announced that it will not appeal an appellate court's decision to dismiss the indictment against South Jersey power broker George E. Norcross III, former Camden Mayor Dana Redd, and others. The office cited a desire to focus its prosecutorial resources on other matters, though it remains committed to rooting out public corruption.

Why it matters

The decision marks the end of a high-profile legal battle that had drawn significant attention to allegations of corruption and abuse of power in New Jersey politics. Norcross is a powerful political figure in the state, and the dismissal of the charges against him and his associates raises questions about the state's ability to hold influential officials accountable.

The details

The indictment against Norcross, Redd, and others was initially filed in 2020, alleging various corruption charges related to their activities in Camden. However, an appellate court later upheld the dismissal of the indictment, citing issues with the prosecution's case. The Attorney General's Office has now decided not to appeal the decision to the state's Supreme Court, effectively ending the legal battle.

  • The indictment against Norcross and others was filed in 2020.
  • The appellate court upheld the dismissal of the indictment in 2025.
  • The Attorney General's Office announced its decision not to appeal the dismissal on February 18, 2026.

The players

George E. Norcross III

A powerful South Jersey political figure and the subject of the dismissed corruption indictment.

Dana Redd

The former mayor of Camden, New Jersey, who was also named in the dismissed indictment.

New Jersey Attorney General's Office

The state agency that initially filed the corruption charges against Norcross and others, but has now decided not to appeal the dismissal of the indictment.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“In light of the Appellate Division's decision, we have concluded that our prosecutorial resources would be best spent on other matters.”

— Michael Symons, Spokesperson for the New Jersey Attorney General's Office (whyy.org)

“Wrongdoing by public officials undermines faith in our institutions, and the public rightfully demands and deserves that officials perform their duties with integrity and in accordance with the law.”

— Michael Symons, Spokesperson for the New Jersey Attorney General's Office (whyy.org)

The takeaway

The dismissal of the corruption charges against Norcross and his associates highlights the challenges that state prosecutors can face when trying to hold powerful political figures accountable, even in the face of allegations of wrongdoing. This decision raises concerns about the integrity of New Jersey's political system and the public's trust in their elected officials.