- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
New Jersey Court Dismisses Charges Against Power Broker Norcross
Appellate judges uphold ruling to drop racketeering case against influential Democratic figure.
Jan. 30, 2026 at 10:23am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A New Jersey state appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss racketeering charges against George E. Norcross III, a powerful Democratic power broker in the state. Norcross had been accused of illegally obtaining waterfront property in Camden and fraudulently collecting millions in tax breaks, but the court ruled that the charges were 'untimely' and the indictment did not show a conspiracy.
Why it matters
Norcross was once one of the most influential unelected officials in New Jersey, using his political connections to shape the state's policies and economic development. The dismissal of the charges against him represents a major setback for efforts to combat corruption in the state's politics.
The details
The appeals court upheld a February 2025 ruling that dismissed the entire 13-count indictment against Norcross. Prosecutors had accused Norcross and five co-defendants, including his brother and the former mayor of Camden, of leading a 12-year criminal scheme to corruptly obtain waterfront property meant to revitalize the struggling city. However, the judges ruled that many of the charged offenses were 'untimely' or 'time-barred', and the indictment did not show a conspiracy to commit extortion or coercion.
- The appeals court ruling was issued on January 30, 2026.
- The initial charges against Norcross were filed in June 2024.
The players
George E. Norcross III
A powerful Democratic power broker in New Jersey who was accused of illegally obtaining property and fraudulently collecting millions in tax breaks, but had the charges against him dismissed.
Matthew J. Platkin
The former New Jersey attorney general who brought the charges against Norcross as part of a broader campaign against corruption.
Jennifer Davenport
The current acting New Jersey attorney general who must now decide whether to appeal the dismissal of the charges against Norcross to the state's Supreme Court.
Dana L. Redd
The former mayor of Camden who was charged alongside Norcross in the indictment.
Peter E. Warshaw Jr.
The judge who initially dismissed the charges against Norcross, ruling that there was no evidence of a racketeering conspiracy.
What they’re saying
“Are you threatening me?”
— Rival developer
“Absolutely.”
— George E. Norcross III
What’s next
The New Jersey attorney general's office is reviewing the appellate court's ruling and must decide whether to appeal the dismissal of the charges against Norcross to the state's Supreme Court.
The takeaway
The dismissal of the charges against Norcross represents a significant setback in efforts to combat corruption in New Jersey politics, as the once-powerful Democratic power broker has avoided prosecution despite allegations of illegal activities. The case highlights the challenges of holding influential political figures accountable, even in a state known for its history of corruption.


