- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Appeals Court Dismisses Racketeering Charges Against NJ Power Broker George Norcross
Judges say some charges were time-barred, others failed to meet legal requirements
Jan. 30, 2026 at 1:23pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A New Jersey appellate court has declined to reinstate racketeering charges against Democratic power broker George E. Norcross III, dealing a blow to prosecutors who had accused him of running a criminal enterprise. The three-judge panel affirmed a lower court order dismissing a 13-count indictment against Norcross and five codefendants, finding that several of the charges were time-barred under the statute of limitations or failed to meet legal requirements.
Why it matters
This case has been closely watched as it involves allegations of corruption and abuse of power against one of New Jersey's most influential political figures. The dismissal of the charges raises questions about the ability of prosecutors to hold powerful individuals accountable, especially when it comes to complex financial crimes.
The details
Prosecutors had accused Norcross and his associates of using threats of economic and reputational harm, as well as their control of Camden government, to obtain property on the city's waterfront from a developer and a nonprofit. However, the appellate court found that several of the racketeering conspiracy and extortion charges were time-barred, while other counts failed to state a crime or were untimely.
- The indictment was filed in June 2024.
- The lower court judge dismissed the charges in February 2026.
- The appellate court upheld the dismissal on January 30, 2026.
The players
George E. Norcross III
A Democratic power broker in New Jersey, founder of insurance brokerage Conner Strong & Buckelew, and chair of Cooper University Health Care.
Philip Norcross
George Norcross' brother and CEO of the law firm Parker McCay.
Jennifer Davenport
The acting Attorney General of New Jersey, nominated by Democratic Gov. Mikie Sherrill.
Carl Dranoff
A Philadelphia developer who was allegedly coerced by Norcross and his associates into selling property for less than it was worth.
Dana L. Redd
Former mayor of Camden, New Jersey.
What they’re saying
“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”
— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident
What’s next
The acting Attorney General's Office is reviewing the decision and will have to decide whether to file another appeal.
The takeaway
This case highlights the challenges prosecutors face in building successful cases against powerful political figures, especially when it comes to complex financial crimes and the statute of limitations. It raises questions about the ability to hold influential individuals accountable for alleged abuses of power.
