Manchester United Co-Owner Avoids FA Charges

Carrick defends club culture as Mourinho criticized for 'huge mistake'

Published on Mar. 2, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Manchester United co-owner Jim Ratcliffe has escaped any charges from the Football Association (FA) following controversial media interviews, but has been reminded of his responsibilities. Meanwhile, former United player Michael Carrick has backed the club's culture of respect, while ex-manager Jose Mourinho has been criticized by Vincent Kompany for making a 'huge mistake' during his time at Old Trafford.

Why it matters

The incident with Ratcliffe highlights the scrutiny and accountability that comes with owning a high-profile Premier League club. Carrick's defense of United's culture is important amid ongoing questions about the club's direction, while Kompany's critique of Mourinho could provide insight into the former manager's tenure.

The details

Ratcliffe, who owns a 69% stake in Manchester United, was reminded by the FA of his responsibilities as a club owner following controversial comments he made in media interviews. No formal charges were brought against him. Carrick, who played for United and is now a coach, has backed the club's culture of respect, saying it is an important part of the club's identity. Meanwhile, former United manager Mourinho has been criticized by Anderlecht manager Vincent Kompany, who said Mourinho made a 'huge mistake' during his time at Old Trafford.

  • The FA reminded Ratcliffe of his responsibilities as a club owner on February 18, 2026.

The players

Jim Ratcliffe

The co-owner of Manchester United, holding a 69% stake in the club.

Michael Carrick

A former Manchester United player who is now a coach at the club.

Jose Mourinho

The former manager of Manchester United.

Vincent Kompany

The current manager of Anderlecht and a former player, who has criticized Mourinho's time at Manchester United.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”

— Gordon Edgar, grocery employee (Instagram)

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.