Nebraska Man Sentenced to 3 Years for Terroristic Threats

Judge cites public safety risk in consecutive prison term for Julius Krynsky

Published on Feb. 13, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A Nebraska judge sentenced Julius Krynsky to 3 years in prison for a conviction on terroristic threats charges. The court found that imprisonment was necessary to protect the public, citing a substantial risk that Krynsky would engage in additional criminal conduct during any period of probation. Krynsky was accused of threatening to kill his ex-girlfriend Morgan P. Mullenax, her family, and her cat, and then himself, during an incident in October 2024.

Why it matters

This case highlights concerns about repeat offenders and the challenges courts face in balancing public safety with rehabilitation. The judge's decision to impose a consecutive prison term rather than probation suggests a view that Krynsky poses an ongoing threat that requires extended incarceration to protect the community.

The details

According to court documents, Krynsky was convicted of terroristic threats after an incident in October 2024 where he allegedly grabbed, slapped, and pinned down his ex-girlfriend Mullenax, threatened to kill her, her family, and her cat, and then himself. Mullenax was able to escape and contact police, who arrested Krynsky at the scene. The judge sentenced Krynsky to 3 years in prison, to be served consecutively to any other sentence he is currently serving, citing the need to protect public safety due to the risk of additional criminal conduct.

  • Krynsky was arrested on October 4, 2024 following the incident with his ex-girlfriend.
  • Krynsky was convicted on the terroristic threats charge on an unspecified date prior to his sentencing.

The players

Julius Krynsky

A Nebraska man convicted of terroristic threats against his ex-girlfriend Morgan P. Mullenax.

Morgan P. Mullenax

Krynsky's ex-girlfriend, who reported that he threatened to kill her, her family, and her cat during an incident in October 2024.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The judge's decision to impose a consecutive prison term rather than probation suggests Krynsky may pose an ongoing threat, and it's possible the case could be appealed or reviewed for potential parole or early release considerations in the future.

The takeaway

This case highlights the difficult balance courts must strike between public safety and rehabilitation, especially for repeat offenders who are deemed to still pose a substantial risk of future criminal behavior. The judge's decision to impose a consecutive prison term rather than probation suggests a view that extended incarceration is necessary to protect the community from this defendant.