Nebraska Lawmakers Debate Recall Amendment

State Senator Loren Lippincott speaks on proposed measure to allow recall of top officials

Published on Feb. 11, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

State Senator Loren Lippincott addressed a legislative committee in Lincoln, Nebraska, regarding a proposed amendment that would enable the recall of the state's top elected officials. The amendment is aimed at giving citizens more power to hold their leaders accountable.

Why it matters

The proposed recall amendment is a significant political development in Nebraska, as it could shift the balance of power between the state's government and its electorate. The ability to recall elected officials is a contentious issue, with proponents arguing it enhances democratic accountability and opponents raising concerns about political instability.

The details

The amendment, if passed, would establish a process for Nebraska citizens to initiate the recall of the governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, auditor of public accounts, treasurer, attorney general, and members of the Legislature. Supporters believe this would give voters more control over their elected representatives, while critics argue it could lead to frequent and disruptive recall efforts.

  • The legislative committee hearing took place on February 12, 2026.

The players

Loren Lippincott

A state senator in Nebraska who addressed the legislative committee about the proposed recall amendment.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This amendment would give citizens the power to hold their elected officials accountable and ensure they are truly representing the interests of their constituents.”

— Loren Lippincott, State Senator

What’s next

The legislative committee will continue to debate the proposed recall amendment, and if it is approved, it will then go to a vote by the full state legislature.

The takeaway

The debate over the recall amendment in Nebraska highlights the ongoing tension between the desire for greater citizen oversight of elected officials and concerns about political instability. The outcome of this proposal could have significant implications for the state's political landscape.