Black Lives Matter Activist's Trial Delayed Again

Judge cites 'pattern of obstructive behavior' in case involving misuse of state grants

Mar. 17, 2026 at 5:00pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The trial against Black Lives Matter activist Faith Monique Shields-Dixon has been delayed again. She is accused of improperly directing around $124,000 in state grants to businesses owned by her family members. The judge has pushed the trial back to June, noting Shields-Dixon's 'pattern of obstructive behavior' and warning that she may have to represent herself if she cannot find a new attorney by the new trial date.

Why it matters

This case raises concerns about potential misuse of public funds and abuse of power by a community activist. It also highlights the challenges of ensuring transparency and accountability, especially when dealing with high-profile figures.

The details

Shields-Dixon, a prominent Black Lives Matter activist in Fargo, North Dakota, is accused of funneling state grant money intended to support local businesses to companies owned by her own family members. The four-day trial was originally scheduled to begin on April 21st, but Shields-Dixon's attorney has requested to withdraw from the case, prompting the judge to delay the proceedings until June 9th.

  • The trial was originally scheduled to begin on April 21, 2026.
  • The judge has pushed the trial back to June 9, 2026.

The players

Faith Monique Shields-Dixon

A Black Lives Matter activist in Fargo, North Dakota, who is accused of misusing state grant funds.

Judge Bobbi Weiler

The judge presiding over the case, who has cited Shields-Dixon's 'pattern of obstructive behavior' and warned she may have to represent herself if she cannot find a new attorney.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Shields-Dixon has shown, 'a pattern of obstructive behavior.'”

— Judge Bobbi Weiler

What’s next

The judge will decide on June 9th whether Shields-Dixon will be allowed to have an attorney represent her or if she must represent herself in the trial.

The takeaway

This case highlights the importance of ensuring proper oversight and accountability for the use of public funds, even when dealing with high-profile community activists. It also raises questions about the challenges of navigating complex legal proceedings, especially when a defendant exhibits 'obstructive behavior.'