Contrasting Masco and Knife River Construction Companies

Which construction firm is the better investment option?

Published on Feb. 8, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Knife River (NYSE:KNF) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both major construction companies, but a comparison of the two reveals key differences in their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, and analyst recommendations.

Why it matters

Understanding the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two construction industry players can help investors make more informed decisions about where to allocate their capital in the sector.

The details

The analysis shows that Knife River has a stronger consensus rating from analysts and higher potential upside, while Masco has higher revenue, earnings, and a lower price-to-earnings ratio. Masco also has stronger institutional ownership and insider ownership compared to Knife River.

  • The data and analysis are based on the most recent information available as of February 8, 2026.

The players

Knife River Corporation

A construction materials and contracting services company based in Bismarck, North Dakota, operating across five segments in the western and central United States.

Masco Corporation

A Michigan-based manufacturer and distributor of home improvement and building products, including plumbing, decorative, and architectural products, with a global footprint.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

This analysis highlights the key differences between these two construction industry players, with Knife River appearing to have a stronger outlook from analysts but Masco demonstrating better financial metrics. Investors should carefully weigh these factors when considering where to allocate capital in the construction sector.