- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
NC Attorney General Challenges Executive Order on Mail-In Voting
Jackson says the order puts military and disaster-displaced voters at risk of being disenfranchised
Apr. 5, 2026 at 2:04pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson has filed a legal challenge against a recent executive order from the president that would restrict mail-in voting. The order directs the Department of Homeland Security to create a list of eligible voters and provide it to states 60 days before an election, and then requires the U.S. Postal Service to only accept mail-in ballots from voters on that list. Jackson argues this would disenfranchise active-duty military members and North Carolinians displaced by natural disasters like Hurricane Helene.
Why it matters
The executive order could significantly limit access to mail-in voting, which has become an important option for military members and disaster victims to participate in elections. Jackson and other state officials argue the order violates the Constitution and risks disenfranchising thousands of voters.
The details
The executive order directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile a list of eligible voters and provide it to states no fewer than 60 days before an election. It then directs the U.S. Postal Service to accept mail-in ballots only from voters on this 'Mail-in and Absentee Participation List.' Jackson says this would put the votes of over 100,000 military members in North Carolina at risk, as deployments can happen quickly close to an election. The order could also impact North Carolinians displaced by natural disasters like Hurricane Helene within 60 days of an election.
- The executive order was issued on April 3, 2026.
- Jackson filed the legal challenge on April 5, 2026.
The players
Jeff Jackson
The Attorney General of North Carolina who is leading the legal challenge against the executive order.
Department of Homeland Security
The federal agency directed by the executive order to compile a list of eligible voters to provide to states.
U.S. Postal Service
The federal agency directed by the executive order to only accept mail-in ballots from voters on the 'Mail-in and Absentee Participation List'.
What they’re saying
“We have over 100,000 military servicemembers in North Carolina. I am one of them. Under current law, we can request and receive absentee ballots up until the day before the election, which matters because deployments can happen fast. Under this executive order, our absentee ballots would run a very high risk of being rejected by the post office – essentially thrown in the trash – if we deploy within 60 days of the election. That is unacceptable.”
— Jeff Jackson, Attorney General of North Carolina
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide in the coming weeks whether to grant a temporary injunction to block the executive order from being implemented.
The takeaway
This legal challenge highlights the ongoing debate over mail-in voting and the potential for executive actions to restrict ballot access, especially for vulnerable populations like military members and disaster victims. The outcome could have significant implications for voting rights and election integrity in North Carolina and beyond.
Wilmington top stories
Wilmington events
Apr. 11, 2026
Dog's Out The Cage Tour // Mountain Grass Unit


