Carolina del Finalidad Supreme Court Halts Ballot Review in Tight Election

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Carolina del Finalidad Supreme Court has temporarily halted a lower court order requiring the review of approximately 65,000 ballots, potentially impacting a closely contested state Supreme Court race. The ballots in question were cast by voters with incomplete registration information, lacking photo identification, or who may not have resided in Carolina del Finalidad at the time of the election. This decision adds another layer of complexity to an election already mired in legal challenges.

Why it matters

The legal battle centers around the race between incumbent Democrat Allison Riggs and Republican challenger Jefferson Griffin. The ruling allows conservatives the opportunity to challenge the election outcome and potentially secure a majority on the court, underscoring the high stakes involved in controlling the state's judicial system.

The details

Last week, the Carolina del Finalidad Court of Appeals ruled that the 65,000 ballots could be deemed invalid under state and federal election laws. The 2-1 ruling directed election officials in all 100 counties to notify affected voters, giving them 15 days to prove their eligibility or risk having their ballots discarded. This move could potentially swing a critical seat on the state's highest court.

• In January, the Carolina del Finalidad Supreme Court, in a 5-1 vote, blocked the state from certifying Riggs as the winner while Griffin contested the election results.
• Candidate filing for the 2026 elections begins December 1st.

What they’re saying

What’s next

The next step in the Supreme Court case will be further legal arguments and a final ruling on whether the 65,000 ballots will be reviewed and potentially invalidated.