UNC Protesters Get Pause on Indefinite Campus Ban

Federal judge says protesters likely to succeed in free speech claim against open-ended ban from university grounds.

Mar. 13, 2026 at 8:51pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge has ruled that three pro-Palestinian protesters at the University of North Carolina are likely to succeed in their claim that the indefinite campus ban imposed on them violates their free expression rights. The judge said the university has not provided any basis for why an open-ended ban from the Chapel Hill campus is reasonable for the protesters, who maintain the right to keep demonstrating on the university's open, outdoor spaces.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between universities' ability to regulate campus activities and protesters' First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. The ruling could set a precedent for how colleges and universities can restrict access to their grounds, especially for controversial or politically-charged demonstrations.

The details

According to the ruling, the three protesters were issued indefinite bans from the UNC-Chapel Hill campus after participating in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. The judge said the university has not provided sufficient justification for the open-ended nature of the bans, rather than more limited restrictions. The protesters argued they have a right to continue demonstrating in the university's outdoor public spaces.

  • The ruling was issued on Thursday, March 13, 2026.

The players

Judge Thomas D. Schroeder

A federal judge for the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina who issued the ruling in this case.

University of North Carolina

The public university system where the protests took place and the indefinite campus bans were issued.

Three pro-Palestinian protesters

The individuals who were issued indefinite bans from the UNC-Chapel Hill campus and challenged the restrictions in federal court.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Ultimately, the indefinite duration of the bans, coupled with the lack of any basis for them, suggests the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their free expression claim.”

— Judge Thomas D. Schroeder, US District Court Judge

What’s next

The judge's ruling places a temporary pause on the indefinite campus bans, allowing the protesters to continue demonstrating on UNC grounds while the case proceeds. A final decision on the merits of the free speech claims is still pending.

The takeaway

This case underscores the delicate balance universities must strike between campus safety, order, and the constitutional rights of student protesters. The ruling suggests courts will scrutinize overly broad or indefinite restrictions on access to public university spaces for expressive activities.